2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-014-2621-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatible hyaluronic acid polymer-coated quantum dots for CD44+ cancer cell-targeted imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…113,114 As shown in Figure 10, the MTT assay did not show any statistically significant difference ( p > 0.05) in HCEC viability with exposure to AcrpHEMA and HA-grafted pHEMA hydrogel discs for 24 h, when compared to control pHEMA discs, suggesting that the washing steps upon surface acrylation and thiol-ene reaction successfully removed any unreacted chemical components and by-products. Consistent with the current results, previous studies showed that materials involving thiolated HA (HA-SH) and its derivatives or TCEP mediated thiol-ene reactions exhibited little or no cytotoxic effects in vitro 71,73,115 and in vivo. 72,116119 Hence, the modified materials are considered to exhibit acceptable compatibility to HCEC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…113,114 As shown in Figure 10, the MTT assay did not show any statistically significant difference ( p > 0.05) in HCEC viability with exposure to AcrpHEMA and HA-grafted pHEMA hydrogel discs for 24 h, when compared to control pHEMA discs, suggesting that the washing steps upon surface acrylation and thiol-ene reaction successfully removed any unreacted chemical components and by-products. Consistent with the current results, previous studies showed that materials involving thiolated HA (HA-SH) and its derivatives or TCEP mediated thiol-ene reactions exhibited little or no cytotoxic effects in vitro 71,73,115 and in vivo. 72,116119 Hence, the modified materials are considered to exhibit acceptable compatibility to HCEC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The quantification of the free thiols of HA-SH was achieved spectrophotometrically, using Ellman's reagent (5,5 0 -dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid), DTNB). 73 Briefly, unmodified HA, HA-SS-R, and HA-SH were dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 8) containing 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), while L-cysteine was used for the calibration curve (2-20 nmol, R 2 ¼ 0.9987). Samples and L-cysteine standards were mixed with a solution of Ellman's reagent and incubated for 15 min at room temperature under dark conditions, at which time the absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Spectramax Plus 384, Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA).…”
Section: Ellman's Test-quantification Of Free Thiols Of Ha-shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results showed the targeted ability of the HA polymer-wrapped QDs. The receptor blocked assay also confirmed the CD44 receptor imaging of HA polymer-wrapped QD-treated MCF-7 cell lines ( Wang et al, 2014 ). In another recent study, similar results were obtained for multifunctional redox-sensitive HA-modified S-S-PEGylated histamine-loaded diethylenetriamine QDs.…”
Section: Cd44 Engineered Nanocarriers For Cancer Therapysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A cysteamine-modified HA polymer was employed to coat CdSe (CdZnS) QDs through a convenient one-step reverse micelle method. Prepared HA-QDs showed enhanced stability in PBS and fluorescence stability, and excellent targeting ability to CD44+ breast cancer cells without cytotoxicity, indicating that the stability and low-toxicity of QDs could be achieved through an HA coating [86]. Meanwhile, Yongbo et al prepared QDs coated by HA-magnetic Prussian Blue conjugates (HA-PB@QDs) for cancer theranosis (Figure 4).…”
Section: Ha-coated Quantum Dotmentioning
confidence: 99%