2022
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioclimatic context of species' populations determines community stability

Abstract: Aim: It is important to understand the factors affecting community stability because ecosystem function is increasingly at risk from biodiversity loss. Here, we evaluate how a key factor, the position of local environmental conditions within the thermal range of the species, influences the stability of butterfly communities at a continental scale.Location: Spain, UK and Finland.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, tropical niche‐conservatism suggests that insect groups originating in the tropics require adaptation to factors like freezing that occur in cooler temperate climates (Wiens & Donoghue, 2004) limiting species distributions. The UK and Finland are at the northern range limits of many species owing to their cooler climates (Warren et al, 2001) and it is possible a single niche‐dimension, such as temperature (Evans et al, 2022; Melero et al, 2022) or evapotranspiration rates (Hawkins, 2010; Hawkins & Porter, 2003), may disproportionately influence persistence, particularly during extreme events. This would reduce species in the UK and Finland to an adaptable and resilient subset of the wider European assemblage (Thomas, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, tropical niche‐conservatism suggests that insect groups originating in the tropics require adaptation to factors like freezing that occur in cooler temperate climates (Wiens & Donoghue, 2004) limiting species distributions. The UK and Finland are at the northern range limits of many species owing to their cooler climates (Warren et al, 2001) and it is possible a single niche‐dimension, such as temperature (Evans et al, 2022; Melero et al, 2022) or evapotranspiration rates (Hawkins, 2010; Hawkins & Porter, 2003), may disproportionately influence persistence, particularly during extreme events. This would reduce species in the UK and Finland to an adaptable and resilient subset of the wider European assemblage (Thomas, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species at the edge of their niche may also have lower average population stability (Mills et al, 2017; Oliver et al, 2012) and species with larger niche breadths may be more robust to local environmental variation. Finally, when a site is in a different niche position for two species, they may have differing responses to environmental variation at the site (Evans et al, 2022)—reducing temporal synchrony in population dynamics (hereon referred to simply as synchrony).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe all results, we use evidence language (Muff et al, 2022), with 'evidence' for an effect if the 95% posterior uncertainty intervals exclude zero, weak evidence if 80% uncertainty intervals exclude zero, and no evidence if 80% uncertainty intervals contain zero (Evans et al, 2023). We found evidence of positive correlations between the population change scores for blue tits and the mean abundance of all moth groups (Figure 1b,e,h; Tables S1-S11).…”
Section: R E Su Lt S Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Plant diversity is considered as a key indicator to measure community stability, because ecosystem function and structure are increasingly vulnerable to the threat of biodiversity loss ( Evans et al, 2022 ). However, the vast majority of previous studies used species diversity to assess community stability ( Sasaki and Lauenroth, 2011 ; Craven et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%