2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochip readout system for point-of-care applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the current POC system dissipates about tens of watts of average power, including fluidic manipulation and readout, two AA-size batteries with a capacity of 1600 mAh at a nominal voltage of 1.2V can only sustain that system for tens of minutes. While the handheld readers are typically re-usable, the microfluidic cartridge for this reader is disposable (Ahn et al, 2004;Brandenburg et al, 2009).…”
Section: Battery-powered Handheld Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the current POC system dissipates about tens of watts of average power, including fluidic manipulation and readout, two AA-size batteries with a capacity of 1600 mAh at a nominal voltage of 1.2V can only sustain that system for tens of minutes. While the handheld readers are typically re-usable, the microfluidic cartridge for this reader is disposable (Ahn et al, 2004;Brandenburg et al, 2009).…”
Section: Battery-powered Handheld Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a joint project of seven Fraunhofer Institutes a lab-on-chip system has been established which possesses a high degree of integration and modularity to serve the needs of the market as well as developments in biomedicine. 25 With this consortium it is possible to cover the whole value chain necessary to establish a lab-on-chip system that is ready for the market. The different sub-projects are described ranging from the microfluidic cartridge design, assay development and its transfer into the cartridge, the use of different sensor principles to the production of these cartridges to match the economies of scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the current trend is to develop label-free methods that are able to monitor the binding reaction in real-time and provide useful information about the binding kinetics and equilibrium [6]. Label-free detection methods include surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [7,8], grating couplers [9,10], ellipsometry [11], evanescent wave devices [12,13], and reflectometry [14,15]. Most of these methods have detection limits comparable to those achieved with methods involving labeled immunoreagents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%