BMD, A MAJOR DETERMINANT of fracture risk, depends not only on peak bone mass achieved during growth but also on bone loss rate in later life. A number of studies have attempted to dissect the genetic basis of bone loss rate.(1-3) However, cautions should be taken in performing and interpretation of such studies, particularly, in light of the presumption that bone loss rate can be treated as a phenotype independent of BMD for genetic studies.First, there is no clear evidence that the variation of bone loss rate is under genetic control. Ovariectomized mice showed varied bone loss rates among strains, suggesting that the bone loss rate may be regulated by genetic factors (4) ; however, little evidence is available in humans. Christian et al.(5) performed a 16-year longitudinal study in 25 monozygotic (MZ) and 21 dizygotic (DZ) aging male white twins and found no evidence of genetic influence on the loss of BMD/BMC. Kelly et al.(6) conducted a twin study on the rate of BMD change (rather than bone loss) in a cohort of 21 MZ and 19 DZ twins for a relatively short period (range, 1.1-5.5 years). Significant genetic effects on rate of BMD change were detected at lumbar spine and Ward's triangle but not at the femoral neck. However, this study has several apparent limitations, including small sample size, short follow-up study period, and a wide age range of the subjects (range, 24-75 years), which make it difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the genetic determination of bone loss rate. Also, although bone turnover markers may be useful for predicting bone loss rate in some circumstances, (7) the sensitivity and specificity of the predictions are very limited. (8) In addition, the heritability of bone turnover markers is still controversial.(9,10) Thus, no studies have powerfully addressed the important question of whether the rate of bone loss is heritable.Second, the rate of bone loss may be influenced by multiple environmental and physiological factors, such as age, (11) body composition, (12) and skeletal sites.(13) Lack of controlling these important factors may lead to adverse effects on genetic studies of bone loss. Notably, the variation of bone loss rate can never be independent of the variation of BMD. This is determined by the nature of bone loss rate measurement (i.e., computation) and can be easily shown by simple mathematic formulations:where BMD 1 and BMD 2 represent the baseline BMD and the follow-up BMD, respectively. Apparently, the variation of bone loss rate partially reflects the variation of baseline BMD, no matter whether there exists a true physiological connection between baseline BMD value and bone loss rate. Several empirical studies have also suggested that the rate of bone loss may vary depending on the baseline BMD, because women with higher BMD also tend to have faster bone loss. (14,15) In addition, the magnitude of the genetic correlation between bone loss rate and BMD is unknown. Without a clear depiction of the relation between BMD and the subsequent bone loss rate, it is hard...