1987
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/38.3.518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical Changes Associated with Zygotic Pine Embryo Development

Abstract: Periodically from prefertilization to near maturation, pine (Pinus resinosa Ait. and Pinus strobus L.) ovules were analyzed for several biochemical constituents, and the results were expressed on a fresh weight basis. Lipid accumulated in parallel with the growth of the developing seeds.Soluble protein also accumulated but only in the initial stages of development. ATP content peaked approximately two weeks after fertilization, followed about oneweek later by the energy charge; these peaks were associated with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it appears that proplastids are indicative of early stages of embryonic development, whether in vivo or in vitro. These findings provide evidence in support of our previous biochemical studies (9,33,34) that many aspects of somatic embryogenesis mimic or correspond to in vivo embryogenesis (21).…”
Section: Ultrastructural Characterization Of Embryogenic Conifer Callussupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, it appears that proplastids are indicative of early stages of embryonic development, whether in vivo or in vitro. These findings provide evidence in support of our previous biochemical studies (9,33,34) that many aspects of somatic embryogenesis mimic or correspond to in vivo embryogenesis (21).…”
Section: Ultrastructural Characterization Of Embryogenic Conifer Callussupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In Pinus contorta, second-year cones represent 17-45% of the dry mass of the annual shoot (Dick, Leaky, and Jarvis, 1990). Seed mass also increases significantly following fertilization (Singh, 1978), as lipids (Johnson et al, 1987;Tautorus, Fowke, and Dunstan, 1991), protein (Donokaya, Ϫ0.33 0.11 a P: total precipitation from June to August; T: mean temperature between June and August; ring: mean ring index; subscript i: year of cone initiation; subscript p: year of pollination; subscript m: year of seed maturation; subscript mϩ1: year following seed maturation. P values (in parentheses) given for correlations significant at P Յ 0.1; correlations significant at P Ͻ 0.05 shown in boldface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bewley and Black 1985, Cyr et al 1991, Flinn et al 1989, and are excellent biochemical markers of zygotic and somatic embryogenesis. However, there are few reports concerning biochemical development in conifer zygotic embryos (see for example Janick et al 1991, Johnson et al 1987) and only recently, during the course of this present study have other labs reported identification and characterization of conifer storage proteins (Gif ford 1988, Gif ford and Tolley 1989, Misra and Green 1990. Clearly, we need to understand the biochemical processes that occur during conifer zygotic embryogenesis before we can evaluate conifer somatic embryos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%