2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and spectroscopic characterization of an aldehyde oxidoreductase isolated from Desulfovibrio aminophilus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar values were reported for other AORs from SRB with the same substrate. [21][22][23] Kinetic assays followed by dialysis were performed to determine whether the inhibition with EDO, GOL, cyanide, and arsenite is reversible or not. At the indicated inhibitor concentrations after 10 min incubation, the percentages of remnant activity for each inhibitor were 78.1 ( 0.4 for EDO, 48 ( 3 for GOL, and 69.1 ( 0.1 for cyanide; no activity was detected for arsenite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar values were reported for other AORs from SRB with the same substrate. [21][22][23] Kinetic assays followed by dialysis were performed to determine whether the inhibition with EDO, GOL, cyanide, and arsenite is reversible or not. At the indicated inhibitor concentrations after 10 min incubation, the percentages of remnant activity for each inhibitor were 78.1 ( 0.4 for EDO, 48 ( 3 for GOL, and 69.1 ( 0.1 for cyanide; no activity was detected for arsenite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In addition, the Mo(V) EPR signals associated with desulfo forms of XO, such as the "slow"-type signal and the signal obtained upon ethylene glycol (EDO) addition, were also observed. [20][21][22][23] On this basis, it was assumed that AORs from SRB and XO family enzymes have similar active sites and that both would experience the same changes upon reaction with substrates, inhibitors, and reducing agents. Because the structural data of DgAOR did not show the sulfido ligand coordinated to Mo, it was assumed that the enzyme crystallizes in the desulfo inactive form (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FeS I, the proximal center, is closer to the Mo site and is buried inside the protein, whereas FeS II, the distal center, is situated near the surface of the protein. Both iron-sulfur centers and a fraction of the molybdenum ions are paramagnetic in the reduced state of the protein and, in addition, show intercenter magnetic couplings [25][26][27]. The currently accepted mechanism implies substrate interaction with the Mo center, which is then reduced from Mo(VI) to Mo(IV), followed by a two electron transfer to an external electron acceptor, in a process mediated by the two iron-sulfur centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aldehyde oxidoreductases from the SRB Desulfovibrio gigas (Dg), 11 Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (Dd), 12 Desulfovibrio alaskensis (Da), 13 and Desulfovibrio aminophilus (Dam) 14 are homodimeric proteins (∼100 kDa per monomer) that contain molybdenum at the active site. The structures of Dg Aor, the first structure reported for a mononuclear molybdenum-containing enzyme, 15,16 and Dd Aor 17 were solved at the resolution of 1.28 and 2.8 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Molecular Properties and Overall Folding Of Aldehyde Oxidorementioning
confidence: 99%