2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and molecular identification of Solanum lycopersicum L. temperature tolerant bacterial endophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A subset of bacterial endophytes isolated from tomato endorhizosphere (77 isolates), identified by partial sequencing of their 16S rRNA gene, belonged to two phyla (Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) and to three orders, namely, Bacillales (27.3%), with all the isolates in the genus Bacillus; Pseudomonadales (31.2%), with isolates in the genera Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter; and Enterobacteriales (41.6%), with isolates in the genera Enterobacter, Ewingella, Pantoea, Providencia, and Lelliottia. Similarly, some of these genera (Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter) have been isolated from tomato endorhizosphere in studies on beneficial bacteria (Tian et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019). Bacterial strains in the genera, Rhizobium and Ralstonia, have also been isolated from the endorhizophere of tomato plants (Abbamondi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of bacterial endophytes isolated from tomato endorhizosphere (77 isolates), identified by partial sequencing of their 16S rRNA gene, belonged to two phyla (Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) and to three orders, namely, Bacillales (27.3%), with all the isolates in the genus Bacillus; Pseudomonadales (31.2%), with isolates in the genera Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter; and Enterobacteriales (41.6%), with isolates in the genera Enterobacter, Ewingella, Pantoea, Providencia, and Lelliottia. Similarly, some of these genera (Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter) have been isolated from tomato endorhizosphere in studies on beneficial bacteria (Tian et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019). Bacterial strains in the genera, Rhizobium and Ralstonia, have also been isolated from the endorhizophere of tomato plants (Abbamondi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86.95 µg ml −1 ) as determined by the Salkowski assay (Table 1 ) and is comparable to that in the AP strain MB-17a (reportedly producing 110.5 µg/ml IAA) 33 . Other reported AP strains such as YP3, YP4 and IC59 produced low IAA (59.2, 43.8, and 21.9 µg ml −1 , respectively) 34 , 40 , and few others were reported merely as positive for this PGP trait 38 , 40 , 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The highest solubilization potential (17.6 µg ml −1 ) could be achieved within 48 h in liquid NBRIP medium. Like JAS1, another AP strain MB-17a isolated from mung bean roots is also reported with slightly higher phosphate solubilization (PSI of 2.67 cm and solubilization potential of up to 53 μg ml −1 on the 6th day) 33 , while two other studied isolates from soybean and tomato are reported negative for phosphate solubilization potential 38 , 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rhizobium pusense MS-1 (Accession number: MF977751), Bacillus cereus MS-2 (Accession number: KY018604), B. flexus MS-3 Accession number: KX858538), Methylophilus flavus MS-4 (Accession number: MF977752) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MS-5 (Accession number: KX817189, which were previously isolated from the roots of tomatoes, were stored in the Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Department of Botany, B.H.U. [ 25 ]. The bacterial strains were grown to the mid-log phase, and an adjusted cell biomass (~10 9 cells ml −1 ) was harvested using centrifugation (4000 rpm, 5 min at 4 °C), and suspended in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH-7.5 10 −2 M).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%