2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochar and crushed straw additions affect cadmium absorption in cassava-peanut intercropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, analysis of variance showed that the differences in the mean proportions of Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia in the four planting patterns were significant at p < .05, the differences in the proportion of Gemmatimonadetes were significant at p < .01, and the differences in the proportion of Bacteroidetes were significant at p < .001 ( Figure 1b). In addition, the number of unique microbial genera in intercropping sugarcane soils was 68, which was much higher than those in intercropping peanut (14), monocropping sugarcane (17), and monocropping peanut (16; Figure 2). The significant increase in unique genera did not result in the increase of the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (Table 4)…”
Section: Sugarcane/peanut Intercropping Changed the Microbial Commumentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, analysis of variance showed that the differences in the mean proportions of Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia in the four planting patterns were significant at p < .05, the differences in the proportion of Gemmatimonadetes were significant at p < .01, and the differences in the proportion of Bacteroidetes were significant at p < .001 ( Figure 1b). In addition, the number of unique microbial genera in intercropping sugarcane soils was 68, which was much higher than those in intercropping peanut (14), monocropping sugarcane (17), and monocropping peanut (16; Figure 2). The significant increase in unique genera did not result in the increase of the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (Table 4)…”
Section: Sugarcane/peanut Intercropping Changed the Microbial Commumentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies have shown that peanut/maize intercropping changes the rhizosphere as well as nutrient concentrations in shoots [13], releases phytosiderophores, increases the ferric reductase activity of roots, and changes pH and acid phosphatases in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. The cassava/peanut intercropping system, a common model in South China, showed a yield advantage as well as cadmium absorption [14], but it had little effect on microbial diversity [15]. The sugarcane/ peanut intercropping system had long been used in the agricultural process in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (GZAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al 72 reported that after adding rice straw and wheat straw, the accumulation of Cd in maize shoots decreased by 69.5 and 66.9%, respectively. Zeng et al 65 . found that in the cassava-peanut intercropping system, the uptake of Cd by the two crops was significantly reduced after the addition of crop straw.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition effect of biochar mainly relies on the ion exchange of metal cations on its surface 64 and the precipitation or complexation of metal ions on biochar with minerals or functional groups 54 . The inhibition effect of crop straw mainly relies on the decomposition products produced by soil microbes, and there are plenty of functional groups on the surface of crop straw, which can complexation metal ions 65 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fonte: Autor "adaptado de" Seab, 2017. Devido à elevada produção de mandioca no mundo (aproximadamente 281,9 milhões de toneladas em aproximadamente 104 países), a quantidade de resíduos 54 gerados após seu processamento também se mostra significativa. Isso tem propiciado o desenvolvimento de estudos de aplicação desses resíduos, compostos principalmente por folhas, caules e raízes, nas mais diversas funções, incluindo: geração de bioenergia e biocombustíveis, produção de artesanatos e rações animais, obtenção de adsorventes de metais pesados e pigmentos, além de possibilidades de aplicação na obtenção de fungos associados a essas partes, os quais têm se mostrado fontes promissoras para a obtenção de enzimas de interesse industrial como, por exemplo, as proteases (TAPPIBAN et al, 2019;ZENG et al, 2019;SULAIMAN et al, 2018;BEAKOU et al, 2017;SÁNCHEZ et al, 2017;ADEKUNLE; ORSAT; RAGHAVAN, 2016).…”
Section: Figura 19 -Regiões Produtoras De Mandioca No Brasilunclassified