@ERSpublications New studies suggest that passive smoking alone is insufficient to determine a somatic profile in lung cancer http://ow.ly/KJe99The therapeutic landscape of lung cancer has evolved tremendously over the past 10 years with the discovery of oncogenic drivers constitutively activated by mutation, translocation or fusion. An activating EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement is present in around 15% of Caucasian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with targeted therapy constituting the basis of upfront treatment for these patients. Additional potential drivers in NSCLC patients have been found in adenocarcinomas, including mutations in KRAS, BRAF, HER2, and fusions involving the RET, and ROS oncogenes. Many of these molecular abnormalities are found more frequently in never-smokers, relaunching a clinical interest in this patient population. Approximately 25% of all lung cancers are not attributable to tobacco, and the proportion of never-smokers with lung cancer has been increasing over time [1]. Lung cancer in never-smokers is thus regarded as a distinct disease entity with a variable tumorigenic pattern, clinicopathology, and natural history. Two major issues are addressed in the head-to-head papers of the Biocast prospective study: the first describes data on risk factors for NSCLC in never-smokers, and the second concerns the molecular profile of NSCLC in never-smokers.Currently, there is little information available regarding the descriptive epidemiology of lung cancer in never-smokers. One important analysis, derived from 35 databases around the world (13 cohorts and 22 cancer registries on lung cancer), indicates that death rates among never-smokers with lung cancer are greater in men, African Americans, and Asians living in Asia, compared with those of European ancestry [2]. Numerous risk factors have been suggested to explain the occurrence of lung cancer in never-smokers, including environmental smoke exposure, occupational exposure, indoor and outdoor pollution, prior diseases and genetic factors [3][4][5]. Evidence is now established for several of these factors, including environmental tobacco smoke, asbestos, chromium, arsenic, cadmium, silica, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [6][7][8][9]. It has also been reported that workers exposed to tar and soot in concentrations exceeding those present in urban air, as is the case for diesel exhaust exposure (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4), are at increased risk of lung cancer [10,11]. Diesel fumes are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as carcinogenic to humans, leading to particular public health concerns in urban areas.In the present issue of the European Respiratory Journal, COURAUD et al. [12] reported the results of one of the largest prospective European trials conducted in lung cancer in never-smokers (defined as less than 100 cigarettes in a lifetime). The study recruited 384 French patients in 75 participating centres, each individually contacted to perform an interview on risk exposure. The au...