2019
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201809141989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocapacity and ecological water demand in Shule River Basin over the past 20 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3). Based on the transfer matrix analysis 26 , it was found that the forest area increased by 4048.9 km 2 during 1995~2010, which was mainly converted from grassland and cropland. Of this, 3358.8 km 2 of grassland was converted to forest land.…”
Section: Results and Analyses Land Use Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and 3). Based on the transfer matrix analysis 26 , it was found that the forest area increased by 4048.9 km 2 during 1995~2010, which was mainly converted from grassland and cropland. Of this, 3358.8 km 2 of grassland was converted to forest land.…”
Section: Results and Analyses Land Use Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2010, c. 2020) Land use transfer matrices were constructed for the two phases, 1995~2010 and 2010~2020, to quantitatively describe the dynamic change characteristics of land use in the Daling River Basin from 1995 to 2020 (Tables2 and 3). Based on the transfer matrix analysis26 , it was found that the forest area increased by 4048.9 km 2 during 1995~2010, which was mainly converted from grassland and cropland. Of this, 3358.8 km 2 of grassland was converted to forest land.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) In space, it is refined from a national scale to a regional or watershed scale. For example, Yue et al [8] used the state space method to estimate and compare the two urban agglomerations in Liaoning Province; Yue Dongxia et al [9] calculated the ecological carrying capacity by taking Shule River Basin and the counties under its jurisdiction as different scales and taking the ecological water demand of the basin as the mainline. (2) In terms of time, from the static analysis of a single year to the dynamic analysis and future prediction with period, for example, Cai Fei et al [10]calculated the ecological footprint, ecological carrying capacity and ecological deficit of Xi 'a City from 2010 to 2018 based on the ecological footprint theory; in addition to the current situation evaluation, Peng et al [11]used the grey model to predict the development trend of ecological footprint in the urbanization process of the Yangtze River urban accumulation from 2018 to 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%