2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2006.tb01298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biobehavioural reactivity to pain in preterm infants: a marker of neuromotor development

Abstract: In this preliminary study, it was examined whether capacity to react to external stress (acute pain) during neonatal intensive care predicts later neuromotor development at 4 and 8 months corrected chronological age (CCA) in high‐risk preterm infants. Behavioural and cardiac reactivity to blood collection at 32 weeks postconceptional age (PCA) were recorded in addition to developmental outcomes at 4 and 8 months CCA in 35 preterm infants (17 males, 18 females) born ≤800g and/or ≥25 weeks gestational age (GA). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain reactivity in this context may constitute a final common pathway that links prenatal exposure (i.e., alcohol), “programming” or resetting of neurotransmitter and autonomic systems, and arousal regulatory capacities that are predictive of subsequent childhood stress reactivity and developmental risk. In this sense, infant pain reactivity can be regarded as providing a “window” into the developing brain (Doussard‐Roosevelt et al., 1997; Grunau et al., 2006; Oberlander et al., 2002) and reflecting or indexing developmental vulnerability. Interpreting our biobehavioral measures in this context provides a meaningful approach to the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain reactivity in this context may constitute a final common pathway that links prenatal exposure (i.e., alcohol), “programming” or resetting of neurotransmitter and autonomic systems, and arousal regulatory capacities that are predictive of subsequent childhood stress reactivity and developmental risk. In this sense, infant pain reactivity can be regarded as providing a “window” into the developing brain (Doussard‐Roosevelt et al., 1997; Grunau et al., 2006; Oberlander et al., 2002) and reflecting or indexing developmental vulnerability. Interpreting our biobehavioral measures in this context provides a meaningful approach to the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to anatomical, physiological and behavioural studies, neonates can perceive pain (Grunau et al . , Simons & Tibboel ). Because neonates cannot verbally express themselves, behavioural and physiological indicators are used to measure their pain responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unrelieved pain caused by invasive procedures is associated with adverse behavioral and biophysiologic outcomes such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen consumption, and stress hormone secretion, all of which cause marked fluctuation in intracranial pressure, possibly leading to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (Grunau et al, 2005;Holsti, Grunau, Oberlander, & Whitfield, 2004;Taddio, Shah, Gilbert-MacLeod, & Katz, 2002). Early and repeated exposure of preterm infants to pain may also have long-term cumulative sequelae, including prolonged structural and functional alterations in pain pathways that can last into adult life, permanently altering normal or common responses to pain (Abdulkader, Freer, Garry, Fleetwood-Walker, & McIntosh, 2008;Fitzgerald & Walker, 2009;Grunau, Whitfield, et al, 2006). Pain is also believed to be neurotoxic to hippocampal formation (Fitzgerald & Walker, 2009;Grunau et al, 2009;Thompson et al, 2008) and may have specific adverse effects on cognition, memory (Beauchamp et al, 2008;Grunau, Holsti, & Peters, 2006;Grunau et al, 2009), and motor development (Grunau et al, 2009;Holsti, Grunau, Oberlander, & Whitfield, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%