2022
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202101032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioavailability and Health Impact of Ingested Amyloid‐like Protein Fibrils and their Link with Inflammatory Status: A Need for More Research?

Abstract: The use of amyloid‐like protein fibrils (ALFs) in food formulations looks very promising in terms of improving techno‐functional properties, but raises some concerns in terms of food safety, because of their structural resemblance to disease‐related endogenous amyloids. This review focuses on the biological fate and potential health implications of ingested ALF structures in both healthy and predisposed individuals. A comprehensive overview of ALF gastrointestinal digestion, intestinal absorption, and systemic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, others proved FGPNs were more susceptible to digestion due to the (partial) unfolding of proteins during fibrillation resulting in higher exposure of peptide bonds (Nyemb et al., 2014). The digestive behavior of FGPNs was also influenced by the food matrix and gastrointestinal environment, involving individual differences and fed/fasted conditions (Luyckx et al., 2022). Next, we discussed the digestive behavior of FGPNs under complex gastrointestinal conditions; we believed FGPNs were easy to digest and lost their fibrous structure.…”
Section: Multiple Evaluations Of Food‐grade Protein Nanofibrilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, others proved FGPNs were more susceptible to digestion due to the (partial) unfolding of proteins during fibrillation resulting in higher exposure of peptide bonds (Nyemb et al., 2014). The digestive behavior of FGPNs was also influenced by the food matrix and gastrointestinal environment, involving individual differences and fed/fasted conditions (Luyckx et al., 2022). Next, we discussed the digestive behavior of FGPNs under complex gastrointestinal conditions; we believed FGPNs were easy to digest and lost their fibrous structure.…”
Section: Multiple Evaluations Of Food‐grade Protein Nanofibrilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, adding preformed nanofibrils for the same proteins is called seeding, whereas the process that occurs between two different source proteins is defined as cross‐seeding (Hao et al., 2019). A more important problem is the risk of the cross‐seeding of endogenous proteins by food‐derived fibril fragments and fibril cores (Luyckx et al., 2022). The link between functional and pathological amyloid fibrils in the body may increase the tendency to mutually aggregate, greatly increasing the potential health risk of accelerating pathological protein precursors to fibrillation after exogenous FGPNs enter the body.…”
Section: Multiple Evaluations Of Food‐grade Protein Nanofibrilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike pathologically acquired amyloid fibrils, which have been linked to the onset of neurodegenerative diseases, food-borne amyloid-like fibrils (AFs), despite sharing a cross-β sheet structure with the former, have not been associated with such pathogenic effects. , Consequently, they have garnered significant attention in recent research endeavors. Emerging studies aim to unveil the intriguing self-assembly behaviors of proteins inherent to food-borne AFs, differentiating them from conventional aggregation phenomena .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%