2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:wafo.0000012827.95431.b8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioassessment of silvicultural impacts in streams and wetlands of the Eastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another contributing factor to the lack of a regional logging signal is that stream macroinvertebrates recover relatively quickly from forest harvest. In a literature review of logging effects in eastern U.S. streams, Hutchens, Batzer & Reese (2004) report that many of the obvious effects of logging on stream biota are relatively short-lived (<5 years). If this is the case, then at any one point in time, only a small portion of the landscape will have been affected by clear-cut within 5 years, providing a reduced disturbance gradient from which to detect a regional signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another contributing factor to the lack of a regional logging signal is that stream macroinvertebrates recover relatively quickly from forest harvest. In a literature review of logging effects in eastern U.S. streams, Hutchens, Batzer & Reese (2004) report that many of the obvious effects of logging on stream biota are relatively short-lived (<5 years). If this is the case, then at any one point in time, only a small portion of the landscape will have been affected by clear-cut within 5 years, providing a reduced disturbance gradient from which to detect a regional signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional research at these sites may determine whether the patterns we observed were real or spurious. This study only measured two postharvest years; Hutchens et al (2004) cautioned that longer-term studies are needed to evaluate subtler effects. However, Stone and Wallace (1998) reported increasing similarity over time between clear-cut streams and reference streams in North Carolina in a 16-year study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Conceivably, semi-aquatic bryophytes may provide the most appropriate indices for anthropogenic change in many ecosystems since they are located at the terrestrial-aquatic interface, and are therefore influenced by changes occurring in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Timber harvest effects that may prove detrimental to bryophyte health include increased erosion and sediment, altered stream flow regimes, microclimate (including light availability and air and stream temperature) and nutrient regimes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Given bryophyte sensitivity to disturbance, forest management including clearcutting or thinning (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%