Bioanalytical Methods for Characterization of CAR‐T Cellular Kinetics: Comparison of PCR Assays and Matrices

Abstract

Recently, multiple chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T)‐based therapies have been approved for treating hematological malignancies, targeting CD19 and B‐cell maturation antigen. Unlike protein or antibody therapies, CAR‐T therapies are “living cell” therapies whose pharmacokinetics are characterized by expansion, distribution, contraction, and persistence. Therefore, this unique modality requires a different approach for quantitation compared with conventional ligand binding assays implemented for most biologics. Cellular (flow cytometry) or molecular assays (polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) can be deployed with each having unique advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we describe the molecular assays utilized: quantitative PCR (qPCR), which was the initial platform used to estimate transgene copy numbers and more recently droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) which quantitates the absolute copy numbers of CAR transgene. The comparability of the two methods in patient samples and of each method across different matrices (isolated CD3+ T‐cells or whole blood) was also performed. The results show a good correlation between qPCR and ddPCR for the amplification of same gene in clinical samples from a CAR‐T therapy trial. In addition, our studies show that the qPCR‐based amplification of transgene levels was well‐correlated, independent of DNA sources (either CD3+ T‐cells or whole blood). Our results also highlight that ddPCR can be a better platform for monitoring samples at the early phase of CAR‐T dosing prior to expansion and during long‐term monitoring as they can detect samples with very low copy numbers with high sensitivity, in addition to easier implementation and sample logistics.

Novel Therapeutic Modalities: The Future is Now

“…17 In another White Paper, Mody and collaborators from the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development present an industry perspective on best clinical pharmacology practices for the development of CAR-T and T cell receptor T cell therapies, including clinical study design and modeling and simulation strategies, underscoring the unique and critical role of clinical pharmacology. 18 This is further exemplified in the study by Masilamani et al, 19 who compare bioanalytical methods for characterization of CAR-T cellular kinetics. Unlike proteins or antibodies, CAR-T are "living cell" therapies whose pharmacokinetics (PKs) are characterized by expansion, distribution, contraction, and persistence.…”