2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16634-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactivity and safety evaluations of Cupressus sempervirens essential oil, its nanoemulsion and main terpenes against Culex quinquefasciatus Say

Abstract: The essential oil (EO) of Cupressus sempervirens was obtained by hydrodistillation and analysed using gas chromatographyflame ionization detection (GC-FID) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Two monoterpenes, α-pinene (49.1%) and δ-3-carene (21.4%), and one sesquiterpene hydrocarbon, α-cedrol (5.1%), were isolated as the EO major terpenes. An oil-in-water nanoemulsion (particle size 71.2 nm) was produced from the EO through a low-energy method. The EO, its nanoemulsion and its main constituents … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant products with pesticidal activities are often wrongly considered safe with no negative effects on nontargets, including humans, without this being experimentally verified. Nevertheless, many authors stated that EOs, nanoemulsion preparations, and oil terpenes were relatively safe when assessed against several nontarget species [3,17,28,69]. In that regard, most reports have focussed on assessing the acute toxicity, whereas both subchronic and chronic evaluations have not been fully undertaken [5,17,[69][70][71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plant products with pesticidal activities are often wrongly considered safe with no negative effects on nontargets, including humans, without this being experimentally verified. Nevertheless, many authors stated that EOs, nanoemulsion preparations, and oil terpenes were relatively safe when assessed against several nontarget species [3,17,28,69]. In that regard, most reports have focussed on assessing the acute toxicity, whereas both subchronic and chronic evaluations have not been fully undertaken [5,17,[69][70][71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, many authors stated that EOs, nanoemulsion preparations, and oil terpenes were relatively safe when assessed against several nontarget species [3,17,28,69]. In that regard, most reports have focussed on assessing the acute toxicity, whereas both subchronic and chronic evaluations have not been fully undertaken [5,17,[69][70][71]. Regarding cypress oil, health risks or side effects following administration of designated therapeutic dosages are not recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%