2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.548.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactive Porous Silica Ceramics Prepared Using Rice Husk Ash by Gelcasting Method

Abstract: Silica-based porous bioactive ceramics was prepared by gel-casting method using silica xerogel powder. Xerogel was derived from rice husk ash. 42 vol.% solid containing slurry was prepared in 1:30 (MBAM:AM) monomer cross-linker solution. The srurry was thixotropic. Gel-casted body was machined efficiently. Dired cast body was sintered at 1100oC. Apatite layer was formed on silica body during In vitro bioactivity experiment. The results suggest that the gel-casted silica ceramics can be used as a bioceramics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown ash and SG ceramics show more bioactivity than WA ceramics. This is due to the formation of silanol groups on the surface of the silica particles in the presence of the hydrolysis process 251. In the case of SG, hydrolysis might be more straightforward due to the inherent gel formation of materials.…”
Section: Second Generation Agricultural Wastes and Their Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brown ash and SG ceramics show more bioactivity than WA ceramics. This is due to the formation of silanol groups on the surface of the silica particles in the presence of the hydrolysis process 251. In the case of SG, hydrolysis might be more straightforward due to the inherent gel formation of materials.…”
Section: Second Generation Agricultural Wastes and Their Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amorphous silica‐based porous bioactive ceramics were prepared successfully by a gel‐casting method using silica xerogels powder derived from RHA. They showed good bioactivity and ~25% porosity, with 27.5 ± 0.2 MPa mechanical strength 251…”
Section: Second Generation Agricultural Wastes and Their Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%