2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactive effects of strontium loading on micro/nano surface Ti6Al4V components fabricated by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared the value of the stress transfer from implant to peri‐implant bone and bone–implant contact of our PIL with other typical or modified Ti implants. The implants contain alloys and other implant coating materials including plasma treatment of titanium (plasma), [ 51 ] Sr‐incorporated selective laser melting titanium (SLM‐Sr), [ 52 ] Sr‐incorporated micro/nano rough titanium (MNT‐Sr), [ 53 ] sand‐blasting and large‐grit acid etching with hydroxyapatite (HAP) nanocoating (SLA with HA), [ 54 ] epigallocatechin gallate and magnesium ions (EGCG+Mg 2+ ), [ 55 ] micro‐arc oxidation surface‐treated titanium (MST‐Ti), [ 56 ] polyether ether ketone, [ 9 ] TiNb, [ 57 ] poly(lactic acid) hydroxyapatite (PLA‐HA), [ 58 ] and HAP [ 11 ] ( Figure a). Enhancing osteointegration or energy‐dissipation can only be achieved separately in existing implants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also compared the value of the stress transfer from implant to peri‐implant bone and bone–implant contact of our PIL with other typical or modified Ti implants. The implants contain alloys and other implant coating materials including plasma treatment of titanium (plasma), [ 51 ] Sr‐incorporated selective laser melting titanium (SLM‐Sr), [ 52 ] Sr‐incorporated micro/nano rough titanium (MNT‐Sr), [ 53 ] sand‐blasting and large‐grit acid etching with hydroxyapatite (HAP) nanocoating (SLA with HA), [ 54 ] epigallocatechin gallate and magnesium ions (EGCG+Mg 2+ ), [ 55 ] micro‐arc oxidation surface‐treated titanium (MST‐Ti), [ 56 ] polyether ether ketone, [ 9 ] TiNb, [ 57 ] poly(lactic acid) hydroxyapatite (PLA‐HA), [ 58 ] and HAP [ 11 ] ( Figure a). Enhancing osteointegration or energy‐dissipation can only be achieved separately in existing implants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the properties of the PIL with other materials. [ 9,11,51–58 ] a) The PIL possesses both stress reduction and increased osteointegration capability compared with the other published materials. Red five‐pointed star: values for the PIL; green circle (horizontal and vertical axis): values for the Ti implant, respectively; blue triangle: values for alloys and other coating materials; [ 51–55 ] red pentagon: values for alloys and other coating materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implantable biomedical devices often promote fibrous tissue encapsulation on the material-tissue interface. These adverse tissue responses are a critical consideration for the success and optimal integration of long-term implants [13][14][15] . Material surfaces that present biomimetic morphology like nanotube and nanofibers that provides nanoscale architectures have been shown to alter cell/biomaterial interactions 16 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, 3D-printed titanium alloy implants with Sr 2+ coating are well suited for osteoporosis patients requiring joint replacement surgery. Shimizu et al andWei et al (2020, 2020) adopted a strategy of fixing Sr 2+ on the implant surface with micro-nano structure to enhance the early bone binding ability by continuously releasing Sr 2+ . Moreover, to achieve long-term release of Sr 2+ on the implant surface and obtain long-term bone induction ability, developed a coating combining Sr 2+ with zeolite to reduce the release rate of Sr 2+ due to the zeolite cation exchange function.…”
Section: Metal Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%