2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaccumulation and biochemical response in South American native species exposed to zinc: Boosted regression trees as novel tool for biomarkers selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that in the last years there was an increase of the use of IBR indices both in plant and animals in laboratory experiments (Bertrand et al, 2016b(Bertrand et al, , 2017 or field studies (Santos et al, 2016), few of them are applied for defining processes or modes of toxicity. For example, for mussels IBR indices were developed for inmunotoxical (Auffret et al, 2006) and lysosomal biomarkers (Izagirre and Marigomez, 2009) to evaluate contaminated sites.…”
Section: Integrated Biomarker Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that in the last years there was an increase of the use of IBR indices both in plant and animals in laboratory experiments (Bertrand et al, 2016b(Bertrand et al, , 2017 or field studies (Santos et al, 2016), few of them are applied for defining processes or modes of toxicity. For example, for mussels IBR indices were developed for inmunotoxical (Auffret et al, 2006) and lysosomal biomarkers (Izagirre and Marigomez, 2009) to evaluate contaminated sites.…”
Section: Integrated Biomarker Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this analysis is to determine those effect biomarkers with higher capacity to explain or predict the exposure concentrations of CPF. Boosted regression trees (BRT) have been fitted according to procedure described by Bertrand et al (2016a). Briefly, the model was constructed with the GBM packages (Ridgeway, 2013) in R (version 0.98.953), using the code described by Elith et al (2008) including those biomarkers with significant differences to control condition.…”
Section: Boosted Regression Trees and Integrated Biomarkers Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the calculation of IBR needs a previous selection of biological responses to be considered. The use of boosted regression trees (BRTs) is a valid tool to select those biomarkers to be used in IBR (Bertrand et al, 2016a). Therefore, biomarkers from the three plant sectors with a significant variation respect to control condition were used to fit a BRT model.…”
Section: Boosted Regression Trees (Brt) and Integrated Biomarkers Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org). Previous studies reported Potamogeton capacity to evidence pollutants exposure under laboratory conditions (Bertrand et al, 2016(Bertrand et al, , 2017Costa et al, 2018;Monferr an et al, 2009). In a similar way, others authors described the usefulness of Potamogeton in passive monitoring programs, showing to be useful as a biological indicator while evaluating environmental deterioration (Demirezen and Aksoy, 2004;Harguinteguy et al, 2016;Munteanu and Munteanu, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%