2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioabsorbable plates versus metal miniplate systems for use in endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PLLA is already widely utilized in facial bone surgery, with reliable clinical outcomes owing to its sufficient strength to overcome the need for additional support for the fixation of fractures [5,28]. In addition, HA-PLLA shows biodegradability and superior biocompatibility over Ti or Mg alloys [29,30]. Therefore, it could be a highly recommended material in facial bone trauma and craniofacial surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLLA is already widely utilized in facial bone surgery, with reliable clinical outcomes owing to its sufficient strength to overcome the need for additional support for the fixation of fractures [5,28]. In addition, HA-PLLA shows biodegradability and superior biocompatibility over Ti or Mg alloys [29,30]. Therefore, it could be a highly recommended material in facial bone trauma and craniofacial surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. 6,14,15,1731 There were no additional unique studies identified from Web of Science or Cochrane Collaboration Library. The included studies (n = 18) yielded a total of 455 patients with 613 traumatic mandibular fractures treated with resorbable plates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen studies reported their outcomes according to the resorbable material used and were included in a subset analysis. 6,14,15,1723,2531 BiosorbFX (Bionx Ltd, Tampere, Finland) (n = 236/613 fractures; 38.5%) and INION [(Inion, Tampere, Finland) or INION (Striker, Germany)] (n = 131/613 fractures; 21.4%) were the most commonly used resorbable materials. Lactosorb (Walter Lorenz, Jacksonville, Fla.) and INION [(Inion, Tampere, Finland) or INION (Striker, Germany)] had overall complication rates of 32.5% (n = 13/40 fractures) and 28.2% (n = 37/131 fractures), respectively, representing the resorbable implants with the highest rates of adverse events.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, titanium plates and screws have several disadvantages, particularly in the growing patients. Following that some authors try to use for CFs osteosynthesis resor bable sheets and pins [126,127,128,129].…”
Section: The Choice Of Surgical Approach For the Open Treatment Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature presents results in both experimental and clinical studies using 3D plates [97,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118]. Their advantage over conventional Also Kim et al argue that using biodegradable plates is a stable and reliable method for the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures and eliminates the need for secondary surgery for plate removal [128].…”
Section: The Choice Of Surgical Approach For the Open Treatment Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%