2023
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202305646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio‐Templated Chiral Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework for Enantioselective Chemoresistive Sensing

Abstract: Chiral metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have gained rising attention as ordered nanoporous materials for enantiomer separations, chiral catalysis, and sensing. Among those, chiral MOFs are generally obtained through complex synthetic routes by using a limited choice of reactive chiral organic precursors as the primary linkers or auxiliary ligands. Here, we report a template-controlled synthesis of chiral MOFs from achiral precursors grown on chiral nematic cellulosederived nanostructured bio-templates. We demon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the description makes the task sound facile, increasing pore size also results in a higher chance of pore collapsibility upon activation, making this a synthetic challenge . Prominent examples would include the IRMOF and UiO series, which were built on the extension of linker lengthwhile retaining the symmetryfrom their parent MOFs IRMOF-1 (or MOF-5) and UiO-66, respectively. Alternatively, changing the substituents on a linker instead of elongating the carbon chain can also result in different geometries and pore volumes, , which has downstream effects on the chemical properties and selectivities of the MOFs. A variety of applications emerge from these properties; some of the popular fields of investigation include catalysis, , gas storage and separation, , drug delivery, , and sensing. …”
Section: Unique Structural Features Of Mofs/cofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the description makes the task sound facile, increasing pore size also results in a higher chance of pore collapsibility upon activation, making this a synthetic challenge . Prominent examples would include the IRMOF and UiO series, which were built on the extension of linker lengthwhile retaining the symmetryfrom their parent MOFs IRMOF-1 (or MOF-5) and UiO-66, respectively. Alternatively, changing the substituents on a linker instead of elongating the carbon chain can also result in different geometries and pore volumes, , which has downstream effects on the chemical properties and selectivities of the MOFs. A variety of applications emerge from these properties; some of the popular fields of investigation include catalysis, , gas storage and separation, , drug delivery, , and sensing. …”
Section: Unique Structural Features Of Mofs/cofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligands are currently the most dominant source of chirality in nanomaterials due to their diversity and specificity, making them the most promising for potential applications . It has long been accepted that only l -amino acids are found in nature and are simultaneously active, whereas d -isomers are synthesized in laboratories and have even a deleterious impact on organisms.…”
Section: Research Progress Of 2d Chiral Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In comparison with conventional methods, electrochemical approaches have attracted widespread attention for their convenience of installation, inexpensive, faster response, sensitive recognition, and friendliness to the environment. 14,15 Currently, existing studies have designed chiral sensing platforms based on a variety of materials such as inorganic nanoparticles, 16 organic compounds, 17 polysaccharides, 18 proteins and metal−organic frameworks to distinguish Trp enantiomers, 19 among which chiral metal−organic frameworks (CMOFs) are widely used for the fabrication of chiral materials owing to their regular microporous structures, shapes, surface functionalities, and even morphologies, 20,21 which can be highly designed by rational combinations of the components. 22 CMOFs can be classified into two species, one requires a chiral bridging ligand to impart chirality and that the other does not necessitate a chiral bridging ligand but displays chirality in its framework construction.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a variety of analytical techniques have been proposed to distinguish and detect Trp isomers, including chemiluminescence, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and capillary electrophoresis, , with significant sensitivity and accuracy; however, the traditional methods still have limitations of high instrumental expenses, complicated sample manipulation, time-consuming experimental procedures, and the necessity of operator training . In comparison with conventional methods, electrochemical approaches have attracted widespread attention for their convenience of installation, inexpensive, faster response, sensitive recognition, and friendliness to the environment. , Currently, existing studies have designed chiral sensing platforms based on a variety of materials such as inorganic nanoparticles, organic compounds, polysaccharides, proteins and metal–organic frameworks to distinguish Trp enantiomers, among which chiral metal–organic frameworks (CMOFs) are widely used for the fabrication of chiral materials owing to their regular microporous structures, shapes, surface functionalities, and even morphologies, , which can be highly designed by rational combinations of the components . CMOFs can be classified into two species, one requires a chiral bridging ligand to impart chirality and that the other does not necessitate a chiral bridging ligand but displays chirality in its framework construction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%