2022
DOI: 10.3390/app122412837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-Sourced and Biodegradable Membranes

Abstract: Biodegradable membranes with innovative antifouling properties are emerging as possible substitutes for conventional membranes. These types of membranes have the potential to be applied in a wide range of applications, from water treatment to food packaging and energy production. Nevertheless, there are several existing challenges and limitations associated with the use of biodegradable membranes in large scale applications, and further studies are required to determine the degradation mechanisms and their sca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 267 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparatively lower rejection rate of biobased graphene membranes in desalination, when contrasted with other graphene membranes, can be ascribed to few factors. First, structural variations between biobased and synthetic graphene membranes may lead to the presence of unstructured multiple layers of graphene and defects. , These differences can result in variations in pore sizes, distribution, and interlayer distances, thereby influencing the membrane’s selectivity. The salt rejection is significantly influenced by pore diameter, with appropriately sized pores facilitating water flow while preventing the passage of salt ions .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively lower rejection rate of biobased graphene membranes in desalination, when contrasted with other graphene membranes, can be ascribed to few factors. First, structural variations between biobased and synthetic graphene membranes may lead to the presence of unstructured multiple layers of graphene and defects. , These differences can result in variations in pore sizes, distribution, and interlayer distances, thereby influencing the membrane’s selectivity. The salt rejection is significantly influenced by pore diameter, with appropriately sized pores facilitating water flow while preventing the passage of salt ions .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solute-membrane interactions, which could lead to fouling formation, are strongly influenced by membrane properties such as hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, pore size, and surface charge [22,129]. There is a risk of fouling development both in hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymeric membranes.…”
Section: Challenges Of Membrane Technology In Purification Of Plant-b...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a risk of fouling development both in hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymeric membranes. However, membranes with a highly hydrophilic nature are less susceptible to severe fouling development during the separation and purification of organic matter like proteins [22,32,129]. In this regard, Leberknight et al [130] used polyethersulfone (PES) and regenerated cellulose membranes (5 kDa) in an ultrafiltration process for protein recovery from a corn ethanol process.…”
Section: Challenges Of Membrane Technology In Purification Of Plant-b...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand for more environmentally friendly membranes has significantly grown in recent years [ 41 ]. Bio-based polymers offer an opportunity to enhance sustainability in membrane technology by serving as alternative materials for the production of environmentally friendly polymeric membranes [ 42 ]. Cellulose and chitosan are popular choices for producing environmentally friendly polymeric membranes that find application in a wide range of membrane separation processes [ 43 ].…”
Section: Membrane Modification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%