2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio‐Oss® blocks combined with BMP‐2 and VEGF for the regeneration of bony defects and vertical augmentation

Abstract: In the chosen setting and time frame, de novo bone formation did not increase with the additional use of growth factors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(148 reference statements)
3
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In addition, recent studies have demonstrated the osteogenic stimulus of VEGF to be comparable to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in vivo. 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In addition, recent studies have demonstrated the osteogenic stimulus of VEGF to be comparable to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in vivo. 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some clinical and preclinical studies reported successful use of bovine hydroxyapatite block for ridge augmentation (Hammerle et al 2008;Rothamel et al 2009), most of preclinical studies have shown the inferior healing potential with a limited amount of new bone formation compared with autogenous block bone graft (Araujo et al 2002;De Santis et al 2012Schmitt et al 2013). Such hardtype block materials often need to be trimmed in order to conform to the irregular configuration of an osseous defect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In many cases, especially those involving severe atrophy of the jaws, bone augmentation is needed prior to implant placement (Weingart et al 1992;Schliephake et al 1997 Esposito et al 2009;Farhat et al 2008). Vertical augmentation can be performed by onlay bone grafting of the alveolar crest, sinus floor elevation, or combinations of these methods (Neyt et al 1997;Wilkert-Walter et al 2002;Wallace & Froum 2003;Wiltfang et al 2005;Nkenke & Stelzle 2009;Raja 2009;Schmitt et al 2011Schmitt et al , 2012. However, augmented bone is subject to conversion processes, which can lead to a considerable decrease in bone over time after augmentation (Binger & Hell 1999;Wiltfang et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%