2016
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201600080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio‐Inspired Renewable Surface‐Initiated Polymerization from Permanently Embedded Initiators

Abstract: Herein, we describe a simple and robust approach to repeatedly modify surfaces with polymer brushes through surface-initiated atomic transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP), based on an initiator-embedded polystyrene sheet that does not rely on specific surface chemistries for initiator immobilization. The surface-grafted polymer brushes can be wiped away to expose fresh underlying initiator that re-initiates polymerization. This strategy provides a facile route for modification of molded or embossed surface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To allow modification by SI‐ATRP from the micro‐brushes, an amount of functionalized methacrylate comonomer bearing a Br‐functional living free radical initiator, BrMA are added to the AA monomer to give the copolymer. Because the initiator BrMA exists on the surface, the PAABr micro‐brushes can be modified with a wide range of polymer brushes via SI‐ATRP technique …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow modification by SI‐ATRP from the micro‐brushes, an amount of functionalized methacrylate comonomer bearing a Br‐functional living free radical initiator, BrMA are added to the AA monomer to give the copolymer. Because the initiator BrMA exists on the surface, the PAABr micro‐brushes can be modified with a wide range of polymer brushes via SI‐ATRP technique …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] Nevertheless, in macroscale test level such as for in vivo applications, nanothin polymer brushes are liable to be torn even under small loading because of the existing roughness of the sliding pair. [ 15 ] This is already the case of a smooth hard artificial joint grafted with zwitterionic polymer brushes, which hardly showed an ultralow coefficient of friction in realistic contact conditions because of the high contact stresses (proportional to E 2/3 , where E is the Young’s modulus), which could not be avoided even with the adopted smooth surfaces. [ 14 ] Therefore, in the worst case of rough or wear‐induced roughened hard mating surfaces, which typically results in a wider (than in the Hertzian case) distribution of interface contact stresses (due to the multiscale fragmentation of the nominal contact into micro‐ to nanoscale contact patches), polymer brushes alone on a rigid substrate cannot represent a good candidate to provide ultralow friction.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few reports demonstrate the possibility of double or multi-use functional substrates. A "print, erase, and reprint" approach was reported for the rewritable polymer brushes on glass and silicon substrates based on click chemistry [25,26]. Zhou et al demonstrated the repeatable surface modification based on an initiator-embedded polystyrene sheet that did not require specific surface chemistry for the initiator immobilization [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%