2012
DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2012.726179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-Inspired Design of Soft Robotic Assistive Devices: The Interface of Physics, Biology, and Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have seen an evolution from rigid exoskeletons with rigid actuators (Yagn, 1890; Makinson, 1971; Kawamoto et al, 2003; Pratt et al, 2004; Guizzo and Goldstein, 2005; Kazerooni and Steger, 2006; Walsh et al, 2007) to rigid exoskeletons with soft pneumatic actuators (Yamamoto et al, 2003; Tsuji et al, 2013). In parallel, we have seen soft exosuits with rigid tendon-drive actuators (Galiana et al, 2012; Asbeck et al, 2013) transition to soft exosuits with soft pneumatic actuators (Park et al, 2014; Goldfield et al, 2012; Wehner et al, 2013). However, the use of soft materials presents design and fabrication challenges in the fundamental robotic technologies available for actuation, sensing, and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We have seen an evolution from rigid exoskeletons with rigid actuators (Yagn, 1890; Makinson, 1971; Kawamoto et al, 2003; Pratt et al, 2004; Guizzo and Goldstein, 2005; Kazerooni and Steger, 2006; Walsh et al, 2007) to rigid exoskeletons with soft pneumatic actuators (Yamamoto et al, 2003; Tsuji et al, 2013). In parallel, we have seen soft exosuits with rigid tendon-drive actuators (Galiana et al, 2012; Asbeck et al, 2013) transition to soft exosuits with soft pneumatic actuators (Park et al, 2014; Goldfield et al, 2012; Wehner et al, 2013). However, the use of soft materials presents design and fabrication challenges in the fundamental robotic technologies available for actuation, sensing, and control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…71 Soft wearable robots are also promising for improving the life of patients suffering from stroke or brain injuries by providing assistance with grasping and other motor tasks. Soft hand orthotic robots can perform a task as artificial muscle popularly named as second skin [28], which compensates body's impaired motor function cooperating with healthy tissue [25].…”
Section: Soft Robots In Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft material sensors are commonly used to interface with deformable surfaces as they can accommodate the large engineering strains experienced by the surface. Unlike sensors consisting of stiff materials, soft piezoresistive sensors can be used on skin to measure strain [10][11][12] or pressure. 13,14 These types of sensors have been made possible through the development of new, highly deformable, electrically conductive materials, 15,16 the most common variants of which are aggregates consisting of conductive particles (e.g., silver nanowires [AgNWs], [17][18][19][20][21][22] silver microparticles, 23 graphene, 14,24,25 or carbon nanotubes 11,12,14 ) interspersed within a polymeric binding agent, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or polyimide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%