2016
DOI: 10.1007/12_2015_332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-Based Self-Healing Concrete: From Research to Field Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that the MICP process is driven primarly by urea hydrolysis [1, 10, 14, 17, 25, 35]. Caclium carbonate precipitation and the crystal morphology are likely influenced by two major factors: i) biochemical induction and/or ii) purely chemical induction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is believed that the MICP process is driven primarly by urea hydrolysis [1, 10, 14, 17, 25, 35]. Caclium carbonate precipitation and the crystal morphology are likely influenced by two major factors: i) biochemical induction and/or ii) purely chemical induction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is being investigated for possible usefulness in a multitude of applications including underground storage of carbon, healing masonry structures of archaeological importance, and long-term sealing of geologic cracks in large-scale structures [3, 15, 2024]. The MICP phenomenon has been exhaustively studied in bulk systems, sand columns [20, 25, 26], and bio-cementation processes [26, 27] to understand the strength provided by the CaCO 3 . The bacterial involvement has also been explored to understand its importance, control mineral deposition rate, urease activity, crystal size and participation of bacterial cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were cracked in a four-point bending setup and a comparison of the self-healing efficiency was done. The same size of beams and a similar test approach was used to investigate the crack filling in concrete with ureolytic mixed self-protected bacterial cultures [9]. Araújo et al [10] cast beams (40 cm × 20 cm × 250 cm) with concrete containing mixed-in glass capsules or polymethyl methacrylate capsules (both filled with water repellent agent) to validate the self-sealing efficiency of these two encapsulation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Tabbaa et al [24] reported that the panel with the microcapsules was able to heal cracks faster and more complete than a control panel, resulting in a significant impermeability recovery. Aside from the application of self-healing additives in self-healing concrete, several case studies with self-healing repair products have also been reported [9,20,21,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, regardless of the proposed metabolic pathway, MSCC perform better than conventional mortars in terms of water tightness regain 7,9,10 . Such regain in functionality is desired to hinder the ingress of aforementioned aggressive substances and to protect the good state of the rebar 11–13 . In previous microbe-based self-healing studies, it was claimed that biomineralization in microcracks is an effective method for protection of the steel reinforcement 46,9,14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%