2019
DOI: 10.1080/00958972.2019.1672049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binuclear ruthenium(II) complexes of 4,4′-azopyridine bridging ligand as anticancer agents: synthesis, characterization, and in vitro cytotoxicity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As [Ru(bpy) 2 dppz] ⋅ 2 PF 6 was reported to be able to interact with DNA, [10, 11] the DNA binding and photodamaging properties of the new complexes Ru1 and Ru2 were explored. The DNA binding abilities of the complexes were studied by fluorescence competitive binding experiments [22, 23] . As shown in Figure S3 (in the Supporting Information), the emission intensities of DNA‐bound ethidium bromide (EtBr) were greatly decreased upon addition of Ru1 , Ru2 , and [Ru(bpy) 2 (dppz)] ⋅ 2 PF 6 , possibly attributed to the replacement of EtBr by these Ru II complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As [Ru(bpy) 2 dppz] ⋅ 2 PF 6 was reported to be able to interact with DNA, [10, 11] the DNA binding and photodamaging properties of the new complexes Ru1 and Ru2 were explored. The DNA binding abilities of the complexes were studied by fluorescence competitive binding experiments [22, 23] . As shown in Figure S3 (in the Supporting Information), the emission intensities of DNA‐bound ethidium bromide (EtBr) were greatly decreased upon addition of Ru1 , Ru2 , and [Ru(bpy) 2 (dppz)] ⋅ 2 PF 6 , possibly attributed to the replacement of EtBr by these Ru II complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA binding abilities of the complexes weres tudiedb yf luorescencec ompetitive binding experiments. [22,23] As shown in Figure S3 (in the Supporting Information),t he emission intensities of DNA-bound ethidium bromide (EtBr) were greatly decreasedu pon addition of Ru1, Ru2,a nd [Ru(bpy) 2 (dppz)]•2PF 6 , possibly attributed to the replacement of EtBr by theseR u II complexes.H owever,i ti sw orth noting that the Ru II complexes can absorb the excitation light in this assay.W ith the increased amount of Ru II complexes, the excitation light could be absorbed, resulting in fluorescencequenching.…”
Section: Dna Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%