2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binocular rivalry between emotional and neutral stimuli: A validation using fear conditioning and EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
56
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scores on the German version of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Laux et al, 1981) and on the German version of the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory (SPAI; Fydrich, 2001) were somewhat higher than normative data (STAI: M = 41.8, SD = 10.2; SPAI: M = 3.3, SD = 0.9). However, they were well within the range of our previous student samples (Alpers and Gerdes, 2007;Alpers and Pauli, 2006;Alpers et al, 2005). One participant decided not to participate because of the aversive nature of the startle probe.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Scores on the German version of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Laux et al, 1981) and on the German version of the Social Phobia Anxiety Inventory (SPAI; Fydrich, 2001) were somewhat higher than normative data (STAI: M = 41.8, SD = 10.2; SPAI: M = 3.3, SD = 0.9). However, they were well within the range of our previous student samples (Alpers and Gerdes, 2007;Alpers and Pauli, 2006;Alpers et al, 2005). One participant decided not to participate because of the aversive nature of the startle probe.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It has been argued that facilitation of attention to threatening events occurs through feedback from the amygdala to sensory cortical regions (e.g. Alpers, Ruhleder, Walz, Muhlberger, & Pauli, 2005). Several brain imaging studies demonstrated that amygdala activation to the presentation of fearful stimuli is enhanced compared to neutral stimuli (Breiter & Rauch, 1996;LaBar et al, 1998;Morris et al, 1996), and that this fast amygdala response enables modulation of subsequent attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous CS-UCS parings (100%) usually results in rapid acquisition, but also in rapid extinction in human participants (LaBar, Gatenby, Gore, LeDoux, & Phelps, 1998). Therefore, a partial reinforcement schedule was chosen to decrease extinction learning (Phelps, Delgado, Nearing, & LeDoux, 2004) and, thereby, allow us to examine the impact of fear acquisition in a test phase where no more US were presented (see Alpers, Ruhleder, Walz, Mühlberger, & Pauli, 2005). Trials were separated by inter-trial-intervals (ITIs) ranging from 20 s to 35 s. During five ITIs in each block, a startle probe was delivered with inter-probe-intervals of at least 15 s. During fear conditioning, SCRs and startle eyeblink responses were measured as physiological indices of fear acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%