2003
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binocular Rivalry Alternation Rate Declines with Age

Abstract: The effect of aging on the time of spontaneous perceptual alternation in binocular rivalry was examined in 59 subjects. An earlier study reported the change of alternation time by comparing middle-age and elderly subjects. We also observed age-related prolongation in alternation time by comparing subjects in a lower age group (20-34 years) with those in both a middle-age group (35-49 years) and a higher age group (50-64 years). Aging of visual optical functions such as presbyopia or the reduction of contrast s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this study was that the frequency of oscillation decreased with age in a regular manner, and a total lack of change became prevalent in the oldest age classes. The results of a more recent study are in line with these findings (Ukai et al, 2003), in which the alternation rates in three age-groups were compared: 20-34, 35-49, and 50-64-year-old subjects were investigated. They obtained similar results to that of Jalavisto (1964): a prolongation in alternation time as a function of age was found, which is also in line with the developmental studies reviewed so far.…”
Section: Development Of Binocular Visionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result of this study was that the frequency of oscillation decreased with age in a regular manner, and a total lack of change became prevalent in the oldest age classes. The results of a more recent study are in line with these findings (Ukai et al, 2003), in which the alternation rates in three age-groups were compared: 20-34, 35-49, and 50-64-year-old subjects were investigated. They obtained similar results to that of Jalavisto (1964): a prolongation in alternation time as a function of age was found, which is also in line with the developmental studies reviewed so far.…”
Section: Development Of Binocular Visionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Some data has also been collected concerning the changes in binocular rivalry during adulthood (Jalavisto, 1964;Ukai et al 2003). The main finding of these studies is that domination times became longer with age.…”
Section: Development Of Binocular Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the magnitude of binocular rivalry suppression was significantly larger for older than younger individuals, meaning that one percept dominated for a longer period of time. In another binocular rivalry study, Ukai and colleagues (2003) found significant differences in mean binocular rivalry alternation time between younger (20’s), middle-aged (40’s) and older adults (60’s) asked to passively observe the stimuli. The alternation time for the younger adults (2.7 seconds) was significantly faster (that is, shorter dominance duration) than that of the other groups (3.6 seconds for middle-aged adults and 4.29 seconds for older adults).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Holt and Matson (1976) also reported a significantly lower number of reversals in older adults (>65 years old) than in groups ranging in age from 10 to 55, with the highest number of reversals attained by the participants aged 25–45. More recent studies have reported aging effects in bistable perception by using binocular rivalry under passive viewing conditions (Norman, Norman, Pattison, Taylor and Goforth, 2007; Ukai, Ando, and Kuze, 2003). Binocular rivalry occurs when two dissimilar images are presented simultaneously, one to each eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such factors contribute to the signal strength of a presented stimulus or its 'stimulus strength' , which can affect the relative perceptual dominance and alternation rate of the dichoptic images (Howard & Rogers, 2012). Intrinsic human factors that have been shown to be associated with BR include visual acuity (Fahle, 1982), stereoscopic acuity (Enoksson, 1964;Halpern et al, 1987), age (Bannerman et al, 2011;Jalavisto, 1964;Norman et al, 2007;Ukai et al, 2003), voluntary attentional control, and neurochemical state (Bressler et al, 2013;Lack, 1978;van Loon et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%