Binding the Elderly: A Prospective Study of the Use of Mechanical Restraints in an Acute Care Hospital

Abstract

Little information exists on the use of mechanical restraints among nonpsychiatric inpatients. This prospective study evaluates their use among consecutive medical and surgical admissions to an acute care hospital. Daily direct observation of patients and hospital record review provided data on potential predictors of restraint, reasons for their application, complications, and outcome. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate relative risk of restraint while adjusting for duration of hospitalization as well as other variables. Restraints were applied to 37 (17%) of the 222 study patients. Restrained patients were eight times more likely to die during hospitalization (24% v 3%; P less than 0.01). Abnormal mental status exam, diagnosis of dementia, surgery, and presence of monitoring and support devices (eg, intravenous lines) were statistically significant independent predictors of restraint. Mechanical restraint is a common occurrence among nonpsychiatric inpatients particularly those with impaired mentation, requirement for surgery, or intensive medical intervention. Identification of medical and surgical patients at risk for restraint may reduce the use of these devices by concentrating surveillance and prevention on this group.

Reducing the use of physical restraints in nursing homes: will it increase costs?

“…Signs of these negative effects can be seen in the depression and withdrawal, as well as in the increased agitation and combativeness, of many physically restrained residents.1014,2122 Both nursing home residents and hospital patients have described the experience of being in restraints as emotionally devastating, frightening, and humiliating. 18,23 There are also adverse effects on residents' physical health. Use of physical restraints is associated with increased mortality and morbidity.…”

Does a mirror deter wandering in demented older people?

“…Restraint is, however, in common use (Robbins et al, 1987) and the issues raised are complex and not easily answered. Management of wandering requires a diversity of approaches which have been well discussed elsewhere (Pitt, 1987;Royal College of Nursing, 1988).…”

Evidence-based treatment of psychiatric patient

“…The reason to restrain patients on the medical floors may be different than those found in the ED. Studies on medical units provide contradictory results (level II) (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Robbins and others used an average of two restraints on 17% of patients in an acute medical unit to prevent patients from getting out of bed (level II) (11).…”