1951
DOI: 10.1063/1.1748161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding Regions in Diatomic Molecules

Abstract: The concept of intramolecular binding is given a precise definition in a way that relates binding to the forces acting on the nuclei in a diatomic molecule. A consequence of the definition is that the space around the nuclei may be separated into binding and antibinding regions. These regions are described and they depend on the Coulomb law of force and on the ratio of the nuclear charges: the internuclear distance is simply a scale parameter. The influence of a single electron on the binding due to other elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of immense debt which chemistry owes to the classical model of molecule as composed of directionally oriented and well localized chemical bonds, it is not surprising that a lot of effort was and still is devoted to its reconciliation with the quantum mechanical description in terms of delocalized wave functions. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] One of the promising procedures which indeed seem to provide the desired link between the classical and quantum chemical description of chemical bonding is the approach based on the so-called electron localization function (ELF). [19][20][21][22] This function allows the unique partitioning of the molecule into disjunct domains, which indeed are reminiscent of classical chemical bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of immense debt which chemistry owes to the classical model of molecule as composed of directionally oriented and well localized chemical bonds, it is not surprising that a lot of effort was and still is devoted to its reconciliation with the quantum mechanical description in terms of delocalized wave functions. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] One of the promising procedures which indeed seem to provide the desired link between the classical and quantum chemical description of chemical bonding is the approach based on the so-called electron localization function (ELF). [19][20][21][22] This function allows the unique partitioning of the molecule into disjunct domains, which indeed are reminiscent of classical chemical bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not go with the same power of the density, and so certainly the way not to handle it is to just put a constant in front and say it is somewhere between 2=3 and 1." Feynman, 1939) (see the Appendix) 11 considered forces in molecules, and Berlin (1951) developed this picture to separate space near a diatomic molecule into "binding" and "antibinding" regions according to the sign of the electrostatic interaction between the nuclei and the local electron charge distribution. The Hellmann-Feynman equations are exact only for the exact wave function of the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 This is the main difference with respect to QTAIM, which instead is a rigid partition of the molecular space. The other major difference is that Hirshfeld or stockholder partition is not quantum mechanical as the promolecule has no precise quantum mechanical meaning, despite some papers (107) which discuss it within a reappraisal of Berlin's theorem (108).…”
Section: Hirshfeld Analysis and Conceptual Dftmentioning
confidence: 99%