1974
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(74)90168-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of the estradiol receptor from calf uterus to the chromatin: Active forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems with the receptor titration were not anticipated since most reports concerning artifiacts in this approach utilized crude cytosol, whereas a more purified receptor preparation was used in the studies in this paper. It has been reported that the partially purified (ammonium sulfate precipitated) estrogen receptor from calf uterus seemed to lack the nuclear binding inhibitor apparent in the crude cytosol receptor preparation (Sala-Trepat & Vallet-Strouve, 1974). Since the binding of [3H]progesterone to NAP requires intact receptor, a variety of assay conditions used for blanks (e.g., assays with no DNA or NAP and assays with no receptor or denatured receptor) resulted in only a minor contribution to the total radioactivity in each of the assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with the receptor titration were not anticipated since most reports concerning artifiacts in this approach utilized crude cytosol, whereas a more purified receptor preparation was used in the studies in this paper. It has been reported that the partially purified (ammonium sulfate precipitated) estrogen receptor from calf uterus seemed to lack the nuclear binding inhibitor apparent in the crude cytosol receptor preparation (Sala-Trepat & Vallet-Strouve, 1974). Since the binding of [3H]progesterone to NAP requires intact receptor, a variety of assay conditions used for blanks (e.g., assays with no DNA or NAP and assays with no receptor or denatured receptor) resulted in only a minor contribution to the total radioactivity in each of the assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great sensitivity of steroid receptors to proteolytic attack is well-known (24). Even though limited proteolysis of receptor, due to endogenous or exogenous enzymes, may lead to functionally active forms capable of binding to nuclei or DNA (25)(26)(27), receptor proteolysis has been generally implicated in the degradation rather than in the transformation of receptor. One of the conceptual obstacles to accepting proteolysis as the activat- ing step was the fact that no proteolytic enzyme so far studied (28)(29)(30) was able to distinguish between the occupied and the unoccupied receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonrandom affinities for polyand oligonucleotides suggest a complimentary configuration on the receptor protein which functions as a recognition site. The separateness of the polynucleotide recognition site from that of steroid binding in E2R, as well as other steroid receptor complexes, was demonstrated by the effects of limited proteolysis (9)(10)(11). Under these conditions, DNA binding was destroyed without affecting retention of the steroid ligand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%