2000
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m909977199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of PurH to a Muscle-specific Splicing Enhancer Functionally Correlates with Exon Inclusion in Vivo

Abstract: Regulated alternative splicing of avian cardiac troponin T (cTNT) pre-mRNA requires multiple intronic elements called muscle-specific splicing enhancers (MSEs) that flank the alternative exon 5 and promote musclespecific exon inclusion. To understand the function of the MSEs in muscle-specific splicing, we sought to identify trans-acting factors that bind to these elements. MSE3, which is located 66 -81 nucleotides downstream of exon 5, assembles a complex that is both sequenceand muscle-specific. Purification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This system depends on strong constitutive splicing signals consisting of a branchpoint, polypyrimidine tract and exon bridging interactions (Simpson et al ., 2000, 2002). It therefore differs from most metazoan mini‐exon systems, which depend on specific splicing enhancer or silencer sequences, which are recognised by general or gene‐specific trans ‐acting proteins to regulate mini‐exon inclusion or skipping (Modafferi and Black, 1999; Ryan et al ., 2000). The sensitivity of this mini‐exon system to alterations in these splicing parameters has allowed dissection of both the branchpoint and polypyrimidine tract sequences (Simpson et al ., 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system depends on strong constitutive splicing signals consisting of a branchpoint, polypyrimidine tract and exon bridging interactions (Simpson et al ., 2000, 2002). It therefore differs from most metazoan mini‐exon systems, which depend on specific splicing enhancer or silencer sequences, which are recognised by general or gene‐specific trans ‐acting proteins to regulate mini‐exon inclusion or skipping (Modafferi and Black, 1999; Ryan et al ., 2000). The sensitivity of this mini‐exon system to alterations in these splicing parameters has allowed dissection of both the branchpoint and polypyrimidine tract sequences (Simpson et al ., 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other protein families that consist of one or more RNA recognition motifs (RRM) (27) and confer tighter RNA-binding specificity have become visible as splicing regulators, e.g., PurH (39), Sam68 (35), TIA-1 (10), SAP155 (28), and Fox-2 (54). Some are composed of arginine-aspartic acid (RD), arginine-glutamic acid (RE), arginine-glycine-rich motifs, and/or other domains (19,44,50) that can mediate interactions between protein and RNA or protein molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first eukaryote PURH cloned is from an avian hepatic cDNA library (Aimi et al, 1990). Recombinant human PURH protein directly binds to muscle specific splicing enhancer 3 (MSE3) RNA and PURH is the primary determinant that is responsible for the sequencespecific binding activity of this complex (Ryan et al, 2000). These observations strongly suggest that PURH performs a second function as a component of a complex that regulates MSE3-dependent exon inclusion (Ryan et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%