2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2013.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of new cationic porphyrin–tetrapeptide conjugates to nucleoprotein complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes reflect the decrease of free porphyrin and increase of bound porphyrin concentration with increasing base pair/porphyrin ratios. However, the alterations of absorption spectra are significantly different from the changes experienced in the case of TMPCP or TMPCP-4P under similar conditions (Mező et al 2011;Orosz et al 2013 The lack of intercalation is also supported by the optical melting results. The strand separation temperature of DNA is slightly increased by the presence of TMPCP-AK.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These changes reflect the decrease of free porphyrin and increase of bound porphyrin concentration with increasing base pair/porphyrin ratios. However, the alterations of absorption spectra are significantly different from the changes experienced in the case of TMPCP or TMPCP-4P under similar conditions (Mező et al 2011;Orosz et al 2013 The lack of intercalation is also supported by the optical melting results. The strand separation temperature of DNA is slightly increased by the presence of TMPCP-AK.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…DNA binding of porphyrin derivatives, and their peptide conjugates was investigated earlier with comprehensive spectroscopic methods. It was found that both porphyrin derivatives and their peptide conjugates can bind to DNA and reflect on at least two distinct binding modes, i.e., intercalation and external binding (Mező et al 2011;Orosz et al 2013). Among others, these binding forms were identified by their absorption bands, since typical absorption spectra of bound forms show characteristic features relative to the free porphyrin: about 20 nm red shift and about 40% hypochromicity of the Soret band for intercalation, and a fewer red shift and about 5% hypochromicity for external binding (Zupan et al 2004;Pasternack et al 1993;Lee et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using electron microscopy, a massive destruction of virus envelopes was detected after treatment with phthalocyanines containing metal ligands, leading to a significant decrease of virus infectivity of several enveloped viruses [Varicella zoster virus (VZV), HSV-1 and HSV-2], whereas non-enveloped adenovirus was largely resistant to the treatment (Smetana et al 1994). Nevertheless, several studies have presented evidence that non-enveloped viruses are also sensitive to direct PACT inactivation (Kasturi and Platz 1992;Gaspard et al 1995;Costa et al 2008Costa et al , 2010Zupan et al 2008), which might be explained by photoactivated protein crosslinking that leads to direct damage or loss of proteins, and finally the loss of infectivity (Lenard et al 1993;Smetana et al 1997;Orosz et al 2013). At physiological conditions, non-enveloped viruses have negatively charged capsids and enveloped viruses harbour negatively charged glycoproteins on their surface, and are thus likely directly targeted by cationic porphyrins via electrostatic interactions, like previously described for Gram(−) bacteria (Karlin and Brendel 1988;Michen and Graule 2010;Liu et al 2015).…”
Section: Molecular Targets Of Antiviral Pactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to improve the cellular uptake and the binding of cationic porphyrins to DNA was the introduction at the periphery of the macrocycle of one or two copies of a branched tetrapeptide . A dual mode of interaction of the conjugates to DNA was detected by spectroscopic techniques (intercalation and external binding) and intercalative binding was more feasible with the tricationic conjugate, especially on nucleoprotein complexes . In vitro the uptake of porphyrin–tetrapepeptide conjugate was higher for the dicationic species and their cellular localization was proved in cytoplasmic organelles but not in the nuclear region …”
Section: Biomarkers Detection and Emerging Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%