1998
DOI: 10.1021/jp981371t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Na+, Mg+, and Al+ to the π Faces of Naphthalene and Indole:  Ab Initio Mapping Study

Abstract: Binding energy maps have been calculated for the binding of Na + , Mg + , and Al + to the entire π-facial region of indole and to the parts of the naphthalene face near the long central axis. Binding sites exist for all three cations over the phenyl ring and over the pyrrole ring of indole, although for Na + the pyrrole site almost disappears. The phenyl binding site of indole is in all cases about 4 kcal mol -1 more stable than the pyrrole site and about 6 kcal mol -1 more stable than the similar site in naph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(72 reference statements)
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] In this context, a number of calculations have been carried out on several cation-π complexes. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] However, the focus of most of these investigations has been the evaluation of optimal geometries or interaction energies of these complexes. While attempts have been made in some of these investigations to rationalize the large variation in the strength of these interactions, 60,64,67,[76][77][78] little effort has been expended in understanding the origin of these interaction energies using rigorous quantum chemical methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] In this context, a number of calculations have been carried out on several cation-π complexes. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] However, the focus of most of these investigations has been the evaluation of optimal geometries or interaction energies of these complexes. While attempts have been made in some of these investigations to rationalize the large variation in the strength of these interactions, 60,64,67,[76][77][78] little effort has been expended in understanding the origin of these interaction energies using rigorous quantum chemical methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[61] In the Na ± indole complex, the cation can bind to either the benzo-p or pyrrolo-p face of the ligand. [64] For the larger potassium cation, only one type of K ± indole complex is found, in which the cation binds to the benzo-p face, with an estimated PCA of 89 kJ mol À1 (species o, Figure 2). Thus, even though the PCA of pyrrole is larger than that of benzene, it appears that K binds exclusively to the benzo-p face of indole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With free indole as a ligand, metal ions typically show a preference for binding on the aryl ring of the bicyclic system [21][22][23]; however, in metal ion-Trp complexes [16,[24][25][26], or in other environments where competing binding sites are available [27,28], additional geometrical constraints imposed by chelation with oxygens, nitrogens, or other electron-rich binding sites become important and the lowest-energy isomers, tridentate chargesolvated structures, often have the metal ion positioned away from the center of the aryl ring and toward the pyrrole ring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%