2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep13564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding interface between the Salmonella σS/RpoS subunit of RNA polymerase and Crl: hints from bacterial species lacking crl

Abstract: In many Gram-negative bacteria, including Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium), the sigma factor RpoS/σS accumulates during stationary phase of growth, and associates with the core RNA polymerase enzyme (E) to promote transcription initiation of genes involved in general stress resistance and starvation survival. Whereas σ factors are usually inactivated upon interaction with anti-σ proteins, σS binding to the Crl protein increases σS activity by favouring its association to E. Taking advan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, the interaction between Crl and σ S forms an interfacial area of 785 Å 2 (41) and is completely consistent with previous analyses of Crl-s S interactions (26,34,38,40). In summary, our structure: 1) confirms the s S residues previously proposed to interact with Crl based on genetic and biochemical data; 2) identifies additional residues in s S and Crl involved in the intermolecular interaction; 3) reveals that 6 out of 11 (55%) of the residues of σ s contacting Crl are not conserved in σ 70 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Altogether, the interaction between Crl and σ S forms an interfacial area of 785 Å 2 (41) and is completely consistent with previous analyses of Crl-s S interactions (26,34,38,40). In summary, our structure: 1) confirms the s S residues previously proposed to interact with Crl based on genetic and biochemical data; 2) identifies additional residues in s S and Crl involved in the intermolecular interaction; 3) reveals that 6 out of 11 (55%) of the residues of σ s contacting Crl are not conserved in σ 70 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The central role of s S helix α2 confirms previous reports that identified key residues in σ S for its interaction with Crl. Sty σ S R82 is not conserved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) s S , and Pae σ S does not interact with Sty Crl in in vivo bacterial two-hybrid assays unless the corresponding amino acid (Leu) is mutated to an arginine (38). Mutations at this site lead to bacterial colony morphology changes, which is consistent with the interaction of Crl and σ S being important for processes like biofilm formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The region 1.2 adjacent to region 2 was proposed as a recognition site of the regulatory factor Crl. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium RpoS R82L mutant is defective in Crl binding and activation [28]. The fact that LpRpoS 95-195 uses the corresponding Leu113 as a substitute for Arg82 in StRpoS indicates that LpRpoS 95-195 may not be suitable for Crl binding.…”
Section: Lprpos Show a Different Regulatory Factor Binding Site From mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A large collection of genetic and biochemical data have highlighted the importance of Crl in σ S -mediated transcription in bacteria that encode σ S (Cavaliere and Norel, 2016). Crl was demonstrated to directly activate σ S -mediate transcription both in vitro and in vivo (Banta et al, 2013;Banta et al, 2014;Cavaliere et al, 2014;Cavaliere et al, 2015;England et al, 2008;Monteil et al, 2010a;Pratt and Silhavy, 1998;Typas et al, 2007a), and Crl-null Salmonella and E. coli strains displayed impaired biogenesis of curli (important for host cell adhesion and invasion as well as formation of biofilm), increased sensitivity to H 2 O 2 stress, and reduced virulence due to decrease expression of several σ S -regulated genes (Arnqvist et al, 1992;Barnhart and Chapman, 2006;Monteil et al, 2010a;Robbe-Saule et al, 2008;Robbe-Saule et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%