2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-011-0773-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding in Charged Spherically Symmetric Objects

Abstract: We consider the subject of self-binding in static, spherically symmetric objects consisting of a charged fluid. We have shown previously that in the case of a perfect fluid, only the localized part of the mass contributes to gravitational self-binding of such objects and that in the limiting case of objects comprised purely of electromagnetic mass, there is no gravitational binding. Here, we extend this result to the more general case of an anisotropic fluid. Our inspection of the Oppenheimer-Volkov equation a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a final point, we note the very recent claim by Corne et al [75] that 'pure electromagnetic mass cannot exist'. This result seems very puzzling as it raises a question regarding the validity of several classic as well as the seminal work in [5][6][7][8][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]33,35,[76][77][78].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a final point, we note the very recent claim by Corne et al [75] that 'pure electromagnetic mass cannot exist'. This result seems very puzzling as it raises a question regarding the validity of several classic as well as the seminal work in [5][6][7][8][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]33,35,[76][77][78].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this connection we would specially like to mention the study of Arnowitt et al [79] where by considering the same self-energy they conclusively constructed 'pure electromagnetic mass' in the form m = 2|e|, where e is the electric charge. Therefore, we strongly feel that the result of Corne et al [75] needs further investigation with a proper and rigorous methodology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%