1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.35.971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding energy of image-potential states: Dependence on crystal structure and material

Abstract: We have measured the binding energy of the image-potential states on Cu(100) and Ag(100) surfaces with two-photon photoemission spectroscopy. We find E& --0.57 (0.18)+0.02 eV for Cu (100) and 0.53 (0.16)+0.02 eV for Ag(100) for the n =1 (n=2) states, respectively. These values are compared with the nearly hydrogenic binding energies of 0.77 -0.83 eV obtained for the (111)surfaces of Cu, Ag, and Ni using the same method. The comparison shows that the binding energy does not depend on the material as long as the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2(b)). The energy of IPS obtained from photoemission is approximately 0.6 eV below vacuum energy (E V ) for Ag(111) [22] and 0.5 eV for Ag(100) [23]. Our values are therefore larger than those expected for both surfaces, as the work functions are 4.64 eV (Ag(100)) and 4.75 eV (Ag(111)) [24,25].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…2(b)). The energy of IPS obtained from photoemission is approximately 0.6 eV below vacuum energy (E V ) for Ag(111) [22] and 0.5 eV for Ag(100) [23]. Our values are therefore larger than those expected for both surfaces, as the work functions are 4.64 eV (Ag(100)) and 4.75 eV (Ag(111)) [24,25].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 38%
“…42 For this relaxed surface, we obtain a work function ͑⌽ = V vac − E F ͒ of 4.25 eV, which is slightly below the measured value of around 4.4 eV. 15,18,43 By applying the embedding Green-function method, a slightly larger work function of 4.58 eV is obtained. In order to investigate the image potential states, we take the electrostatic image plane position given by Ishida and Liebsch 44 of 2.86 a.u.…”
Section: Image Potential States Of Ag(100)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(a)]. 16,47,48 Then, increasing both the vacuum gap and the bias voltage, i.e., using the (13.2Å, 6.7 V) set point, we are able to identify both n = 1 and 2 FERs. As seen from Fig.…”
Section: A Field Emission Resonance Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%