2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.161404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding energies and spatial structures of small carrier complexes in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides via diffusion Monte Carlo

Abstract: Ground state diffusion Monte Carlo is used to investigate the binding energies and carrier probability distributions of excitons, trions, and biexcitons in a variety of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide materials. We compare these results to approximate variational calculations, as well as to analogous Monte Carlo calculations performed with simplified carrier interaction potentials. Our results highlight the successes and failures of approximate approaches as well as the physical features that d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

27
98
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
27
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 2(c) this energy difference is 65 meV taking into account the small red shift of the XX/D peak after 2 kW/cm 2 . Recent theoretical calculations accurately predict the binding energies of excitons and trions within 2D materials, but they fail to do so for biexcitons [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] .The models predict that the biexciton is less strongly bound than the trion, in contradiction to experimental findings 25,27 . However, the models reconcile this discrepancy by suggesting that the experimentally observed states may actually be those of excited biexcitons, as opposed to ground state biexcitons 25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Figure 2(c) this energy difference is 65 meV taking into account the small red shift of the XX/D peak after 2 kW/cm 2 . Recent theoretical calculations accurately predict the binding energies of excitons and trions within 2D materials, but they fail to do so for biexcitons [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] .The models predict that the biexciton is less strongly bound than the trion, in contradiction to experimental findings 25,27 . However, the models reconcile this discrepancy by suggesting that the experimentally observed states may actually be those of excited biexcitons, as opposed to ground state biexcitons 25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 40%
“…From Figure 2(c) this energy difference is 65 meV taking into account the small red shift of the XX/D peak after 2 kW/cm 2 . Recent theoretical calculations accurately predict the binding energies of excitons and trions within 2D materials, but they fail to do so for biexcitons [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge-carrier complexes play a particularly important role in the optoelec-tronic properties of layered and 2D materials. In the field of 2D materials, the DMC-calculated binding energies of trions [165][166][167] and the binding energies of larger complexes such as biexcitons and quintons (charged biexcitons) 154,168 have been reported, as have the DMC-calculated binding energies and VMC-calculated recombination rates of ion-bound charge carrier complexes in heterobilayers of transition-metal dichalcogenides. 169,170 2.…”
Section: Excitonic Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a few experimental studies have reported the bound biexciton in monolayer TMDs, significant discrepancies between the measured2324252627 and calculated2829303132 binding energy remain, which may arise for several reasons. Experimentally, associating specific spectroscopic features with biexciton states can be extremely challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%