1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00644596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding constants and partial molar volumes of primary alcohols in sodium dodecylsulfate micelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most predominant among them is probably the use of the pseudo-phase model, which is an acceptable approximation for free energy calculations but is understandably less adequate for the representation of more sensitive derivative functions; furthermore, the neglected contribution of all interactions below the cmc may also play a role, as shown by de Lisi et al [14] in the case of partial molar volumes.…”
Section: Micellar Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most predominant among them is probably the use of the pseudo-phase model, which is an acceptable approximation for free energy calculations but is understandably less adequate for the representation of more sensitive derivative functions; furthermore, the neglected contribution of all interactions below the cmc may also play a role, as shown by de Lisi et al [14] in the case of partial molar volumes.…”
Section: Micellar Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the relation between the alcohol aggregation and surfactant micellization was not indicated. Only de Lisi et al [14,15] stated that the addition of the middle-chain alcohols (including propanol) in their low concentration range causes the initial CMC decrease of dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide and with the increasing alcohol concentration, micelles gradually lose their identity. Over the so-called critical microstructure concentration, alcohol molecules aggregate in the bulk phase of the solution and they are probably surrounded by surfactant molecules only in the monomeric form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The literature data concern mainly the influence of alcohol on the surfactant micellization process [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, despite numerous papers describing surfactant behavior in the water + alcohol mixed solvent, this issue has not been sufficiently explained yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The variation in partial volume of solutes in the micellar phase is ascribed to the hydrophilic or hydrophobic interaction between some groups of solute and emulsifier. 26 The reverse behavior (the appearance of the limiting conversion) was observed in the (micro)emulsion polymerization containing a very small amount of butyl acrylate where the limiting conversion results from the hydrophilic interaction between the polar groups of emulsifier (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS) and butyl acrylate. 27 At a very low monomer concentration, the monomer can be consumed by both the solute and propagating radicals.…”
Section: Polymerization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%