2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding characteristics of staphylococcal protein A and streptococcal protein G for fragment crystallizable portion of human immunoglobulin G

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this analysis, molecular docking studies are used extensively [58] , [59] . Before starting the discussion, it is essential to know that the terms binding energy and binding affinity are in inverse relation with each other, and better ligand-protein complex results from more negative binding energy [60] . The binding affinity is the strength of the binding interaction between the ligand and receptor, and the binding energy describes the binding strength of the ligand in the binding pocket of the receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this analysis, molecular docking studies are used extensively [58] , [59] . Before starting the discussion, it is essential to know that the terms binding energy and binding affinity are in inverse relation with each other, and better ligand-protein complex results from more negative binding energy [60] . The binding affinity is the strength of the binding interaction between the ligand and receptor, and the binding energy describes the binding strength of the ligand in the binding pocket of the receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A truncated octahedral TIP3P [ 38 ] water box with 10 Å was employed to solvate the protein–ligand complex. Two rounds of minimizations were performed, including the steepest descent and conjugate gradient algorithms [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Then, both systems were heated up from 0 to 300 K within 1 ns of MD simulations under the canonical ensemble, using the position restraints of 10 kcal/(mol∙Å 2 ) on the solute atoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding energy and the equilibrium dissociation constant (K D ) were calculated by the YASARA software, version 19.5.23. The most stable conformation of the receptor was determined based on the ligand with the lowest binding energy, indicated by the most negative value [29]. The tighter the ligand-protein binding, or the greater the affinity between them, the smaller the dissociation constant [30].…”
Section: Molecular Docking (Zdock)mentioning
confidence: 99%