“…Without utilizing a pharmacologic intervention such as the tyrosine-hydroxylase inhibitor α-methly-para-tyrosine (AMPT) to deplete tonic dopamine (Abi-Dargham et al, 2000;Caravaggio et al, 2014;Laruelle et al, 1997;Martinez et al, 2009), our outcome measure, BP ND , reflects tracer bound to receptors not currently occupied by the endogenous neurotransmitter (ie, dopamine) and therefore measures receptor availability (Innis et al, 2007). [ 11 C](+)PHNO has been shown to be substantially more sensitive to endogenous dopamine competition (ie, increased tracer displacement resulting in lower BP ND ) compared with the antagonist tracers used in prior studies (Cropley et al, 2008;Gallezot et al, 2014a;Ginovart et al, 2006;Moerlein et al, 1997;Shotbolt et al, 2012;Willeit et al, 2008); thus, our receptor availability findings could also be due to OB individuals exhibiting lower levels of tonic dopamine. In fact, this concept is consistent with prior reports that have shown dietinduced OB and OB-prone rats exhibited lower levels of tonic dopamine or less dopaminergic-mediated behaviors (ie, conditioned place preference or amphetamine-induced locomotor activity) compared with standard chow fed or OB-resistant controls (Geiger et al, 2009;Hryhorczuk et al, 2016;Rada et al, 2010).…”