2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding and Transport of Carboxylated Drugs by the Multidrug Transporter AcrB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our understanding of this mechanism has been reinforced by both structural and mutagenesis approaches including conditional cross-linking [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], as well as by computer simulations [ 21 , 22 ]. The sequestering of substrates/drugs by the pump can occur through a number of different pathways—known as substrate channels, that allow for capture of the cargo from the periplasmic space (channel 2 and channel 3) or from the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (channel 1 and channel 4) [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In the L (A) protomer, the channels 1 and 2 converge on a “proximal” drug-binding pocket (PBP), also known as the “access” pocket [ 19 , 23 , 26 ], which is separated by a “switch-loop” from the deep- or distal-binding pocket (DBP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our understanding of this mechanism has been reinforced by both structural and mutagenesis approaches including conditional cross-linking [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], as well as by computer simulations [ 21 , 22 ]. The sequestering of substrates/drugs by the pump can occur through a number of different pathways—known as substrate channels, that allow for capture of the cargo from the periplasmic space (channel 2 and channel 3) or from the outer leaflet of the inner membrane (channel 1 and channel 4) [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In the L (A) protomer, the channels 1 and 2 converge on a “proximal” drug-binding pocket (PBP), also known as the “access” pocket [ 19 , 23 , 26 ], which is separated by a “switch-loop” from the deep- or distal-binding pocket (DBP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel 3, which originates from an interprotomer space known as the vestibule has been shown to bypass the PBP providing direct access to the DBP and a distinct selectivity [ 27 ]. Channel 4 was discovered very recently as the putative entry path for fusidic acid and other carboxylated antibiotics, and is directly connected to the DBP within the T protomer (from here on referred as DBP T ) [ 25 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for one of them (Khailova et al, 2015;Nazarov et al, 2017), the spectrum of action opened up as the antibiotic was being studied, from acting only toward gram-positive bacteria (Khailova et al, 2015), to acting on any bacteria, with the exception of those which had a certain AcrAB-TolC multidrug resistance pump (Nazarov et al, 2017(Nazarov et al, , 2019. The tripartite efflux system AcrAB-TolC is the main drug efflux transporter complex in Escherichia coli (Tam et al, 2020), which extrudes multiple antibiotics (erythromycin, oxacillin, ciprofloxacin, etc. ), dyes (rhodamine 6G, ethidium, acridine, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being localized between PN1 and PN2, the dynamics of this loop is correlated to the significant decrease of the interface size between these two subdomains in state B. At that stage of the mechanism, the drug binding pocket must get larger in order to accommodate the drug, whatever the recognition site-out of three-exploited by the drug [10,36,44].…”
Section: Incidence Of These Subdomains On Overall Relative Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that stage of the mechanism, the drug binding pocket must get larger in order to accommodate the drug, whatever the recognition site-out of three-exploited by the drug. 10,36,44 Loop8, which contains T676-loop described in the literature, is the linker between PC1 and PC2. These two subdomains do not undergo conformational changes themselves (lRMSD less than the subdomains' mean displacement, Figure 2), and their tighter interactions owes to the movements of the connecting loops.…”
Section: Incidence Of These Subdomains On Overall Relative Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%