“…The extensive structural variation in diverse tmRNA sequences, and the sporadic occurrence of some helical regions, has been noted previously (Williams & Bartel 1998;Zwieb et al+, 1999)+ Extensive structural variability occurs even within the gamma-group proteobacterial sequences reported here, confirming the notion that much of the tmRNA structure can vary with little effect on its basic function+ Indeed, experimental modifications of the E. coli tmRNA have shown that three of the pseudoknots (pk2, pk3, and pk4; Fig+ 4) are completely interchangeable and can even be replaced by unstructured regions with no significant loss of function (Nameki et al+, 2000)+ We suspect that these phylogenetically volatile regions of the structure occur on the surface of the functional unit because of spacefilling constraints (Burgin et al+, 1990), whereas conserved structural elements and sequences are expected to form the functional core of tmRNA+ A recent crosslinking study also may shed some light on the variability of tmRNA across different lineages+ In this study, the investigators discovered substantial crosslinking between tmRNA and ribosomal protein S1 (Wower et al+, 2000)+ Ribosomal protein S1, however, is not found in all bacterial lineages, specifically the Low GϩC group of Gram-positive bacteria+ Thus, at least in this group of Bacteria, tmRNA must find an alternative binding site+ If the binding site of tmRNA can change radically, as this study suggests, then such extensive variability in tmRNA secondary structure may be expected+…”