2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding Affinity Prediction by Pairwise Function Based on Neural Network

Abstract: We present a new approach to estimate the binding affinity from given three-dimensional poses of protein–ligand complexes. In this scheme, every protein–ligand atom pair makes an additive free-energy contribution. The sum of these pairwise contributions then gives the total binding free energy or the logarithm of the dissociation constant. The pairwise contribution is calculated by a function implemented via a neural network that takes the properties of the two atoms and their distance as input. The pairwise f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that, in contrast to some famous MLbased scoring functions which have been trained based on atom pair contact counts, such as RF-Score, [16] CScore, [36] and OnionNet, [24] our featurization model includes the significance of differences in interatomic distance values for each atom-pair contact and discriminates between close and far contacts by the above weighting scheme -the closer contacts will gain more weight and the farther distances will have less weight, in line with chemical intuition. It should be added here that, very recently Zhu et al [37] have used the inverse of distance and some atomic properties as inputs for training Neural Networks to predict protein-ligand binding affinity. Finally, the contribution of each particular ligand-protein atom type pair to the complex featurization (x i,j ) was derived from a linear summation of all same atom type pairs in the complex.…”
Section: Defining Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that, in contrast to some famous MLbased scoring functions which have been trained based on atom pair contact counts, such as RF-Score, [16] CScore, [36] and OnionNet, [24] our featurization model includes the significance of differences in interatomic distance values for each atom-pair contact and discriminates between close and far contacts by the above weighting scheme -the closer contacts will gain more weight and the farther distances will have less weight, in line with chemical intuition. It should be added here that, very recently Zhu et al [37] have used the inverse of distance and some atomic properties as inputs for training Neural Networks to predict protein-ligand binding affinity. Finally, the contribution of each particular ligand-protein atom type pair to the complex featurization (x i,j ) was derived from a linear summation of all same atom type pairs in the complex.…”
Section: Defining Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, simply the protein-ligand atom pairs together with their distances can be used as input. In the work by Zhu et al [ 98 ], all atom pair energy contributions are summed, where the contributions themselves are learned through a neural network considering the properties of the two atoms and their distances. Similarly, Pereira et al [ 99 ] introduced the atom context method to represent the environment of the interacting atoms, i.e., atom and amino acid embeddings.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, large chemical libraries can be screened earlier, starting with hit identification. There has also been some success applying machine learning (ML) to predict small molecule binding to the protein target (Zhu et al, 2020). LBDD is used when no structural information is available, and initial hit identification is frequently acquired experimentally by running high-throughput biochemical assays.…”
Section: Overview Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%