2020
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation Improves Speech Perception, Quality of Life, Tinnitus Distress, and Psychological Comorbidities

Abstract: Objectives: To determine and compare the benefit of binaural hearing rehabilitation via cochlear implantation (CI) on speech perception, assessment of auditory abilities, tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological comorbidities in patients suffering from asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) as well as bilaterally-deafened and sequentially bilaterally-implanted patients. Methods: 53 patients were implanted between 2011 and 2016.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of patients included in this review was 1,285 with a mean of 45.9 (SD 35.8) patients per study (range 20–153). The gender breakdown was reported in 16 studies (n = 772) (1,2,5,6,8,22–25,27–29,36,38–40) with 389 (50.4%) men and 383 (49.6%) women. The age of participating patients ranged from 14 to 81 years and the mean age as reported in 17 studies (n = 969) (1,2,5,6,8,22–25,27–29,35,36,38–40) ranged from 42.5 to 64.2 years of age; here, we report a weighted mean age of 54.5 years for those patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total number of patients included in this review was 1,285 with a mean of 45.9 (SD 35.8) patients per study (range 20–153). The gender breakdown was reported in 16 studies (n = 772) (1,2,5,6,8,22–25,27–29,36,38–40) with 389 (50.4%) men and 383 (49.6%) women. The age of participating patients ranged from 14 to 81 years and the mean age as reported in 17 studies (n = 969) (1,2,5,6,8,22–25,27–29,35,36,38–40) ranged from 42.5 to 64.2 years of age; here, we report a weighted mean age of 54.5 years for those patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age of participating patients ranged from 14 to 81 years and the mean age as reported in 17 studies (n = 969) (1,2,5,6,8,22–25,27–29,35,36,38–40) ranged from 42.5 to 64.2 years of age; here, we report a weighted mean age of 54.5 years for those patients. The mean duration of hearing loss was reported in five studies (1,22,25,28,40) and ranged from 8.8 (SD 11.2) years to 18.8 (SD 18.8) years; the most common causes of hearing loss as reported by seven studies (5,6,8,22,24,26,29) were congenital hearing loss, idiopathic hearing loss, and infection-related hearing loss. Except for five patients, all had post-lingual deafness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the positive previously reported effect of a CI on tinnitus in a large group of hearing impaired patients (Ketterer et al 2020;Peter et al 2019;Ramakers et al 2015Ramakers et al , 2017, tinnitus remains a problem for a significant proportion of CI users (Gomersall, Baguley, and Carlyon 2019). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability and the effect of sound therapy on tinnitus and speech perception in CI users who still experience tinnitus during CI use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Auditory stimulation can also be electrically provided by a cochlear implant (CI). So far, the benefit of a CI on tinnitus is mainly studied in patients receiving their implant because of severe to profound hearing loss (Ketterer et al 2020;Peter et al 2019;Ramakers et al 2015Ramakers et al , 2017. In these studies, a decrease in tinnitus burden or even complete suppression of tinnitus has been demonstrated, with only a minimal risk of inducing tinnitus (Peter et al 2019;Ramakers et al 2015).…”
Section: Treatment Options For Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI companies are currently working with HA manufacturers to provide communication benefits to individuals with hearing loss. There is abundant scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of CIs in aural rehabilitation [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. In 2009, Laske et al [47] assessed the subjective and objective benefits of CIs in adults.…”
Section: Cochlear Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%