1992
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/254.1.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary systems: higher order gravitational radiation damping and wave emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
164
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
164
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the tidal interaction between two neutron stars in DNS is extremely weak (Bildsten & Cutler 1992), the major mechanism that changes the orbital semimajor axis and eccentricity of DNS is the emission of gravitational waves. To account for gravitational radiation driven orbital evolution, we use the current observational parameters as initial conditions and integrate Equations (35) and (36) in Junker & Schäfer (1992) backward in time. Because of the uncertainty in the true age of the observed DNS (see Kiziltan & Thorsett 2010 for details), we randomly draw the integration time t i from a uniform distribution of ages between 0 and τ c , where τ c is the characteristic age of the DNS.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the tidal interaction between two neutron stars in DNS is extremely weak (Bildsten & Cutler 1992), the major mechanism that changes the orbital semimajor axis and eccentricity of DNS is the emission of gravitational waves. To account for gravitational radiation driven orbital evolution, we use the current observational parameters as initial conditions and integrate Equations (35) and (36) in Junker & Schäfer (1992) backward in time. Because of the uncertainty in the true age of the observed DNS (see Kiziltan & Thorsett 2010 for details), we randomly draw the integration time t i from a uniform distribution of ages between 0 and τ c , where τ c is the characteristic age of the DNS.…”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Iyer and Will [10,11] approached this from the opposite direction, beginning with the 1PN accurate flux expressions [26][27][28], and deriving the most general form of a two-body relative equation of motion at 2.5PN and 3.5PN order required by energy and angular momentum balance. Writing the radiation-reaction terms in the equation of motion (1.2) in the general form …”
Section: B 35pn Radiation Reaction and Energy-angular-momentum Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this relation, it is now easy to derive from the eqs. (33) and (35) the leading order contributions [14] …”
Section: Gravitational Waveforms -Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%