2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7841631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Locally Repairable Codes - Sequential Repair for Multiple Erasures

Abstract: Locally repairable codes (LRC) for distribute storage allow two approaches to locally repair multiple failed nodes: 1) parallel approach, by which each newcomer access a set of r live nodes (r is the repair locality) to download data and recover the lost packet; and 2) sequential approach, by which the newcomers are properly ordered and each newcomer access a set of r other nodes, which can be either a live node or a newcomer ordered before it. An [n, k] linear code with locality r and allows local repair for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also several optimal code constructions in the literature [4], [5], [7], [13]- [15], [19]- [21] that achieve the equality in (2). The rate upper bound for (r, δ)-LRCs has been shown in [15], [22] to be k n ≤ r r + δ + 1 , which can also be expressed as an upper bound on the dimension as k ≤ n r + δ + 1 · r.…”
Section: (R δ)-Localitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also several optimal code constructions in the literature [4], [5], [7], [13]- [15], [19]- [21] that achieve the equality in (2). The rate upper bound for (r, δ)-LRCs has been shown in [15], [22] to be k n ≤ r r + δ + 1 , which can also be expressed as an upper bound on the dimension as k ≤ n r + δ + 1 · r.…”
Section: (R δ)-Localitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequential approach to recovery from multiple erasures was introduced by Prakash et al [12] and has been further investigated in [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [30], [1], [2] as discussed below. a) Two Erasures: Seq-LRC with t = 2 are considered in [12] (see also [32]) where a tight upper bound on the rate and a matching construction achieving the upper bound on rate for t = 2 is provided. A lower bound on block length and a construction achieving the lower bound on block length for t = 2 is provided in [32].…”
Section: Background On Seq-lrcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate bounds on LRCs from any of these classes yield upper bounds on the rate of an LRCs with (r,t)-availability. A discussion on the hierarchy of these classes can be found in [36]. a) LRCs with strong local codes, wherein every symbol is protected by an (r + t, r,t + 1) local code, were considered in [20,17,15,37].…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result shows the uniqueness of such a construction for rate optimal codes with exact covering. For the sequential recovery of t = 3 erasures with locality r under functional repair model, [36] presents a lower bound on the length of a code. Under suitable divisibility assumptions, this bound for r = 2 translates to the rate bound of 4/9.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%