2020 International Conference on Advanced Aspects of Software Engineering (ICAASE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icaase51408.2020.9380108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Gabor pattern (BGP) descriptor and principal component analysis (PCA) for steel surface defects classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCA is a linear combination method, which is widely used in feature dimension reduction of steel surface defects [33,122,128,129]. This method is simple, however, in many cases, the features are non-linear.…”
Section: Transform Domain Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCA is a linear combination method, which is widely used in feature dimension reduction of steel surface defects [33,122,128,129]. This method is simple, however, in many cases, the features are non-linear.…”
Section: Transform Domain Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM shows many unique advantages in solving small sample, non-linear and high-dimensional pattern recognition, and has been widely used in steel surface defect detection [16,18,113,121,123,124,128].…”
Section: Support Vector Machine (Svm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed DST-GLCM approach was able to achieve a classification rate of 96%. Zaghdoudi et al [5] proposed an approach based on the Binary Gabor Pattern (BGP) to extract significant features of hot-rolled steel strips' surface defects. Then, after applying the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique, the reduced features were fed to an SVM classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the recognition accuracy was low. Zaghdoudi et al (2020) used the dimensionality reduction program based on principal EC 40,6 component analysis to obtain the compact representation of the defect image and the SVM multi-class classifier to give the final decision. However, these methods are based on the open dataset NEU-DET, and there is no field test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%