2016
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2016.1203047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary DE-Based Channel Selection and Weighted Ensemble of SVM Classification for Novel Brain–Computer Interface Using Devanagari Script-Based P300 Speller Paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this accuracy diminishes when the number of trials is reduced. Specifically, for 3-5 trials, the P300 detection accuracy falls within the range of 73-88% (Chaurasiya et al, 2016;Kshirsagar & Londhe, 2019). In comparison to the above-mentioned studies, the proposed approach reports a comparable performance of 81.12% accuracy using a simple classifier on a single trial.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, this accuracy diminishes when the number of trials is reduced. Specifically, for 3-5 trials, the P300 detection accuracy falls within the range of 73-88% (Chaurasiya et al, 2016;Kshirsagar & Londhe, 2019). In comparison to the above-mentioned studies, the proposed approach reports a comparable performance of 81.12% accuracy using a simple classifier on a single trial.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Eliminating or shortening the calibration also reduces the mental load for the users; our experiments reflect that most subjects did not feel obvious fatigue. Second, by applying a zero-calibrated CNN (the subject-independent CNN or the self-training-based CNN) as a P300 detection model, this system achieves comparable performances to those of traditional P300 BCIs with full calibration [41], [42], [43]. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have implemented zero-calibrated models online.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work First degree polynomial Zhang et al (2016a), Haque et al (2016), Zhang et al (2016bZhang et al ( , 2017b, Krawczyk et al (2016Krawczyk et al ( , 2015, , Krawczyk et al (2013), , , Chaurasiya et al (2016), Obo et al (2016), Zhang et al (2017a), Onan et al (2016), Pourtaheri and Zahiri (2016), Saleh et al (2016, Ojha et al (2017), Davidsen and Padmavathamma (2015), Lacy et al (2015a), Kim and Cho (2015), Sikdar et al (2015Sikdar et al ( , 2014b, Jackowski et al (2014), Jackowski (2014,2015), Ojha et al (2014Ojha et al ( , 2015, Schaefer (2013), Wozniak (2009), Sikdar et al (2012Sikdar et al ( , 2014aSikdar et al ( , 2013, Kim and Cho (2008a), Liu et al (2007), Escovedo et al (2013aEscovedo et al ( , 2014Escovedo et al ( , 2013c…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of methods were proposed for this task, such as using genetic algorithms (Krawczyk et al, 2016;Ojha et al, 2017), particle swarm optimization (Saleh et al, 2016), flower pollination (Zhang et al, 2017a), differential evolution (Sikdar et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2016bZhang et al, , 2017b, etc. Those methods can be applied to both homogeneous (Chaurasiya et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016bZhang et al, , 2017b and heterogeneous (Zhang et al, 2014;Ojha et al, 2015) base learner sets. For classification, methods may also differ in the number of voting weights, either by using one voting weight per classifier (e.g., Zhang et al, 2014;Obo et al, 2016) or one voting weight per classifier per class (e.g., Fatima et al, 2013;Sikdar et al, 2015;Davidsen & Padmavathamma, 2015).…”
Section: Linear Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%