2002
DOI: 10.1086/341191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Aggregations in Hierarchical Galaxy Formation: The Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function

Abstract: We develop a semi-analytic model of hierarchical galaxy formation with an improved treatment of the evolution of galaxies inside dark matter haloes. We take into account not only dynamical friction processes building up the central dominant galaxy, but also binary aggregations of satellite galaxies inside a common halo. These deplete small to intermediate mass objects, affecting the slope of the luminosity function at its faint end, with significant observable consequences. We model the effect of two-body aggr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
134
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the brightest magnitudes, the CDM model underpredicts the number of bright sources, while it overpredicts the number of fainter sources dominating the deeper sample. This is analogous to what has already been found at z ' 3 and confirms a general trend of this version of CDM models to underpredict the amount of SFR in high-redshift massive objects (Somerville & Primack 2001;Poli et al 2001;Menci et al 2002;Cimatti et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the brightest magnitudes, the CDM model underpredicts the number of bright sources, while it overpredicts the number of fainter sources dominating the deeper sample. This is analogous to what has already been found at z ' 3 and confirms a general trend of this version of CDM models to underpredict the amount of SFR in high-redshift massive objects (Somerville & Primack 2001;Poli et al 2001;Menci et al 2002;Cimatti et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To discuss this point, we present in both panels of Figure 3 the UV LD predicted by the CDM semianalytic model described in Menci et al (2002). This model is based on the Cole et al (2000) recipes, with an additional improved treatment of aggregation of satellite galaxies in common dark matter halos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Starting from primordial density perturbations in a ÃCDM universe, the model describes the collapse and merging histories of the DM haloes that originate from such perturbations. In previous papers (see, e.g., Menci et al 2002) we have described our model in detail; it includes the dynamical friction and the binary aggregations, determining the fate of clumps included into larger DM haloes along the hierarchy of mergers. The baryonic processes (gas cooling, star formation, and supernova feedback) are linked to the dynamical history of the galaxies through the simple recipes adopted by current SAMs (Kauffmann et al 1993;Cole et al 1994;Somerville & Primack 1999;Poli et al 1999;Wu et al 2000;Cole et al 2000).…”
Section: Predictions By Cdm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current renditions of hierarchical galaxy formation in CDM dominated universes have so far failed to predict these empirical findings, favoring instead a late formation with major activity even below z ∼ 1. The culprit is probably in the ways in which star formation and feedback processes have been parameterized and implemented in the so-called semi-analytic models of galaxy formation and evolution (e.g., Kauffmann & Charlot 1998;Cole et al 2001;Somerville et al 2001;Menci et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%